Nehemiah · Chapter 11

V. 1. To dwell-That the buildings of the city might be compleated, and the safety of it better provided for.

Verse 1. To bring one of ten] Jerusalem certainly had many inhabitants at this time; but not sufficient to preserve the city, which was now encompassed with a wall, and the rebuilding of which was going on fast. Nehemiah therefore obliged one tenth of the country people to come and dwell in it, that the population might be sufficient for the preservation and defence of the city. Ten were set apart, and the lot cast among them to see which one of the ten should take up his residence in the city.

Verse 1. The rulers of the people dwelt at Jerusalem — Where their very office, in some sort, obliged them to dwell; and where, it seems, Nehemiah had desired the principal men of the nation, by way of example, to fix their habitations. The rest of the people also cast lots, to bring one of ten to dwell in Jerusalem — That the building of the city might be completed, and the honour and safety of it better provided for. The bulk of the Jews, it appears, rather chose to live in the country than at Jerusalem. One reason of which might be, that they were generally shepherds, and lovers of agriculture, and therefore the country was more suited to their genius and manner of life than the city. Add to this, that their enemies were now so enraged to see the walls built again, and so restless in their designs to keep Jerusalem from rising to its former splendour, that many were terrified from coming to dwell there, thinking themselves more safe in the country, where their enemies had no pretence to disturb them. In order, therefore, to compel a certain proportion of them to remove to the city, the expedient of casting lots is resorted to. Though the casting of lots be certainly forbidden, where the thing is done out of a spirit of superstition, or with a design to tempt God; yet on some occasions it is enjoined by God himself, and the most holy persons, both in the Old and New Testaments, have practised it in particular cases. The wise man acknowledges the usefulness of this custom when he tells us that the lot causeth contention to cease, and parteth between the mighty, Proverbs 18:18; and therefore it was no bad policy, as things now stood, to take this method of division; since the lot, which all allowed was under the divine direction, falling upon such a person rather than another, would be a great means, no doubt, to make him remove more contentedly into the city.

Verse 1. To bring one in ten to dwell in Jerusalem. The inhabitants were not yet sufficiently numerous for the public works and services, and for the defence of the city. Hence it became necessary to draught a tenth of the rural population for these purposes.

THE INHABITANTS OF JERUSALEM INCREASED, 1, 2.

According to Nehemiah 7:4, 5, the nation had assembled at Jerusalem to reckon its numbers and devise some plan for increasing the population of the city, which was large and but thinly peopled. Nehemiah improved the occasion, first of all, to instruct the people in the law, and observe the feasts of the seventh month, and also make provision for the regular observance of the temple service. The people were brought to feel their oneness, and caught again the enthusiasm and zeal of the true old theocratic spirit. Having devoted the three chapters preceding to a narration of those most important facts, the writer now proceeds to tell in a few words how the population of the holy city was increased.

1. The rulers… dwelt at Jerusalem — A noble example. While the city was exposed to dangerous attacks, and the inhabitants were few and feeble, the rulers stood at their posts of duty. So at a later day, when persecution drove all the Christian population from Jerusalem, the apostles remained there still. Acts 8:1. The rest of the people — That is, all the people who were not residents of Jerusalem. One of ten — A tithe of the people. According to the register of chap. vii, the whole congregation numbered forty-two thousand three hundred and sixty. This number had probably not greatly varied since the time of Zerubbabel, and the population of the city was probably increased by not far from four thousand persons. The holy city — Jerusalem; so called from being the seat of the temple and of the national worship, and the center of numerous holy associations.

V. 2. Blessed-Because they denied themselves, and their own safety and profit for the publick good; for this city was the butt of all the malicious plots of their enemies; and for the present it was rather chargeable than beneficial to its inhabitants.

Verse 2. All the men that willingly offered] Some volunteered their services, which was considered a sacrifice to patriotism at that time, as Jerusalem afforded very few advantages, and was a place of considerable danger; hence the people spoke well of them, and no doubt prayed for God’s blessing upon them.

Verse 2. The people blessed all the men that willingly offered themselves — Besides those who were chosen by lot, it seems there were some that voluntarily chose to go and live there, whom the people highly commended, beseeching God to bless and prosper them: for indeed they were worthy to be honoured, because they denied themselves, and their own safety and profit, for the public good, and the glory of God; seeking the restoration of their nation, the defence of their city, and the welfare of their country, and having zeal for the divine service performed there; for, no doubt, more profit accrued to those who settled in the country where they chose, and had as much ground to cultivate as they wished, than to those who were confined to the city, and the small portion of land which lay about it.

2. The men, that willingly offered themselves — Those who, being chosen by lot, willingly consented to remove their residence to Jerusalem. The words do not imply that any on whom the lot fell showed unwillingness to remove to the holy city. Doubtless all who were thus chosen cheerfully acquiesced, and, consulting not their own security so much as the public good, received the blessings of a grateful people.

V. 3. Province-Of Judea, which was now made a province. Israel-The generality of the people of Israel, whether of Judah, or Benjamin, or any other tribe. These he calls Israel rather than Judah, because there were many of the other tribes now incorporated with them; and because none of the tribes of Israel, except Judah and Benjamin, dwelt in Jerusalem.

Verse 3. Now these are the chief] A good deal of difference will be found between the enumeration here and that in 1 Chronicles 9:2, &c. There, those only who came with Zerubbabel appear to be numbered; here, those, and the persons who came with Ezra and Nehemiah, enter into the account.

Verse 3. These are the chief of the province — Of Judea, which was now made a province. Israel — The generality of the people of Israel, whether of Judah, or Benjamin, or any other tribe. These he calls Israel, rather than Judah, because there were many of the other tribes now incorporated with them; and because none of the tribes of Israel, except Judah and Benjamin, dwelt in Jerusalem.

LIST OF THE CHIEFS OF THE PROVINCE, 3-16.

A comparison of this list with that of 1 Chronicles 9, (where see notes,) shows that they both agree in their plan, and in a considerable number of their names. The differences are too many to allow the opinion that the lists are substantially identical, and that each is an imperfect transcript of an older and fuller catalogue of names. The list in Chronicles contains, according to its heading, the names of those who first settled in their possessions after the exile; the present list is of later date, and belongs to the times of Nehemiah.

3. The chief of the province — The chiefs or heads of families who represented the entire province of Judea in the time of Nehemiah. This providence was then one of the subdivisions of the Persian empire. But in the cities of Judah — Rather, and in the cities of Judah. The list contains the names of chief fathers dwelling in other cities of the province as well as in Jerusalem. See verses 25-36. Israel — This word here denotes the entire body of the covenant people, (the laity, so to speak,) exclusive of the four special classes next named.

LIST OF THE CHIEFS OF THE PROVINCE, 3-16.

A comparison of this list with that of 1 Chronicles 9, (where see notes,) shows that they both agree in their plan, and in a considerable number of their names. The differences are too many to allow the opinion that the lists are substantially identical, and that each is an imperfect transcript of an older and fuller catalogue of names. The list in Chronicles contains, according to its heading, the names of those who first settled in their possessions after the exile; the present list is of later date, and belongs to the times of Nehemiah.

3. The chief of the province — The chiefs or heads of families who represented the entire province of Judea in the time of Nehemiah. This providence was then one of the subdivisions of the Persian empire. But in the cities of Judah — Rather, and in the cities of Judah. The list contains the names of chief fathers dwelling in other cities of the province as well as in Jerusalem. See verses 25-36. Israel — This word here denotes the entire body of the covenant people, (the laity, so to speak,) exclusive of the four special classes next named.

LIST OF THE CHIEFS OF THE PROVINCE, 3-16.

A comparison of this list with that of 1 Chronicles 9, (where see notes,) shows that they both agree in their plan, and in a considerable number of their names. The differences are too many to allow the opinion that the lists are substantially identical, and that each is an imperfect transcript of an older and fuller catalogue of names. The list in Chronicles contains, according to its heading, the names of those who first settled in their possessions after the exile; the present list is of later date, and belongs to the times of Nehemiah.

3. The chief of the province — The chiefs or heads of families who represented the entire province of Judea in the time of Nehemiah. This providence was then one of the subdivisions of the Persian empire. But in the cities of Judah — Rather, and in the cities of Judah. The list contains the names of chief fathers dwelling in other cities of the province as well as in Jerusalem. See verses 25-36. Israel — This word here denotes the entire body of the covenant people, (the laity, so to speak,) exclusive of the four special classes next named.

Verse 6. Four hundred threescore and eight valiant men — Such were most proper for this place and time, because of its many enemies round about.

LIST OF THE CHIEFS OF THE PROVINCE, 3-16.

A comparison of this list with that of 1 Chronicles 9, (where see notes,) shows that they both agree in their plan, and in a considerable number of their names. The differences are too many to allow the opinion that the lists are substantially identical, and that each is an imperfect transcript of an older and fuller catalogue of names. The list in Chronicles contains, according to its heading, the names of those who first settled in their possessions after the exile; the present list is of later date, and belongs to the times of Nehemiah.

3. The chief of the province — The chiefs or heads of families who represented the entire province of Judea in the time of Nehemiah. This providence was then one of the subdivisions of the Persian empire. But in the cities of Judah — Rather, and in the cities of Judah. The list contains the names of chief fathers dwelling in other cities of the province as well as in Jerusalem. See verses 25-36. Israel — This word here denotes the entire body of the covenant people, (the laity, so to speak,) exclusive of the four special classes next named.

LIST OF THE CHIEFS OF THE PROVINCE, 3-16.

A comparison of this list with that of 1 Chronicles 9, (where see notes,) shows that they both agree in their plan, and in a considerable number of their names. The differences are too many to allow the opinion that the lists are substantially identical, and that each is an imperfect transcript of an older and fuller catalogue of names. The list in Chronicles contains, according to its heading, the names of those who first settled in their possessions after the exile; the present list is of later date, and belongs to the times of Nehemiah.

3. The chief of the province — The chiefs or heads of families who represented the entire province of Judea in the time of Nehemiah. This providence was then one of the subdivisions of the Persian empire. But in the cities of Judah — Rather, and in the cities of Judah. The list contains the names of chief fathers dwelling in other cities of the province as well as in Jerusalem. See verses 25-36. Israel — This word here denotes the entire body of the covenant people, (the laity, so to speak,) exclusive of the four special classes next named.

Verses 8, 9. Nine hundred twenty and eight — So there were more of Benjamin than of Judah, because the city did chiefly, and most properly, belong to that tribe, as hath been observed before. Joel was their overseer — The captain of their thousand.

LIST OF THE CHIEFS OF THE PROVINCE, 3-16.

A comparison of this list with that of 1 Chronicles 9, (where see notes,) shows that they both agree in their plan, and in a considerable number of their names. The differences are too many to allow the opinion that the lists are substantially identical, and that each is an imperfect transcript of an older and fuller catalogue of names. The list in Chronicles contains, according to its heading, the names of those who first settled in their possessions after the exile; the present list is of later date, and belongs to the times of Nehemiah.

3. The chief of the province — The chiefs or heads of families who represented the entire province of Judea in the time of Nehemiah. This providence was then one of the subdivisions of the Persian empire. But in the cities of Judah — Rather, and in the cities of Judah. The list contains the names of chief fathers dwelling in other cities of the province as well as in Jerusalem. See verses 25-36. Israel — This word here denotes the entire body of the covenant people, (the laity, so to speak,) exclusive of the four special classes next named.

V. 9. Overseer-The captain of their thousand.

Verse 9. And Joel-was their overseer] Joel was chief or magistrate over those, and Judah was his second or deputy. Perhaps each had a different office, but that of Joel was the chief.

Verses 8, 9. Nine hundred twenty and eight — So there were more of Benjamin than of Judah, because the city did chiefly, and most properly, belong to that tribe, as hath been observed before. Joel was their overseer — The captain of their thousand.

LIST OF THE CHIEFS OF THE PROVINCE, 3-16.

A comparison of this list with that of 1 Chronicles 9, (where see notes,) shows that they both agree in their plan, and in a considerable number of their names. The differences are too many to allow the opinion that the lists are substantially identical, and that each is an imperfect transcript of an older and fuller catalogue of names. The list in Chronicles contains, according to its heading, the names of those who first settled in their possessions after the exile; the present list is of later date, and belongs to the times of Nehemiah.

3. The chief of the province — The chiefs or heads of families who represented the entire province of Judea in the time of Nehemiah. This providence was then one of the subdivisions of the Persian empire. But in the cities of Judah — Rather, and in the cities of Judah. The list contains the names of chief fathers dwelling in other cities of the province as well as in Jerusalem. See verses 25-36. Israel — This word here denotes the entire body of the covenant people, (the laity, so to speak,) exclusive of the four special classes next named.

LIST OF THE CHIEFS OF THE PROVINCE, 3-16.

A comparison of this list with that of 1 Chronicles 9, (where see notes,) shows that they both agree in their plan, and in a considerable number of their names. The differences are too many to allow the opinion that the lists are substantially identical, and that each is an imperfect transcript of an older and fuller catalogue of names. The list in Chronicles contains, according to its heading, the names of those who first settled in their possessions after the exile; the present list is of later date, and belongs to the times of Nehemiah.

3. The chief of the province — The chiefs or heads of families who represented the entire province of Judea in the time of Nehemiah. This providence was then one of the subdivisions of the Persian empire. But in the cities of Judah — Rather, and in the cities of Judah. The list contains the names of chief fathers dwelling in other cities of the province as well as in Jerusalem. See verses 25-36. Israel — This word here denotes the entire body of the covenant people, (the laity, so to speak,) exclusive of the four special classes next named.

Verse 11. Ruler of the house of God.] He had the command over all secular matters, as the high priest had over those which were spiritual.

Verse 11. The ruler of the house of God — One of the chief priests, who ruled with and under the high-priest.

Ver. 11. Ruler of the house of God. A secular officer, having charge of the temporal affairs; but not to interfere with the offices and duties of religion, which belonged to the priests and levites.

LIST OF THE CHIEFS OF THE PROVINCE, 3-16.

A comparison of this list with that of 1 Chronicles 9, (where see notes,) shows that they both agree in their plan, and in a considerable number of their names. The differences are too many to allow the opinion that the lists are substantially identical, and that each is an imperfect transcript of an older and fuller catalogue of names. The list in Chronicles contains, according to its heading, the names of those who first settled in their possessions after the exile; the present list is of later date, and belongs to the times of Nehemiah.

3. The chief of the province — The chiefs or heads of families who represented the entire province of Judea in the time of Nehemiah. This providence was then one of the subdivisions of the Persian empire. But in the cities of Judah — Rather, and in the cities of Judah. The list contains the names of chief fathers dwelling in other cities of the province as well as in Jerusalem. See verses 25-36. Israel — This word here denotes the entire body of the covenant people, (the laity, so to speak,) exclusive of the four special classes next named.

LIST OF THE CHIEFS OF THE PROVINCE, 3-16.

A comparison of this list with that of 1 Chronicles 9, (where see notes,) shows that they both agree in their plan, and in a considerable number of their names. The differences are too many to allow the opinion that the lists are substantially identical, and that each is an imperfect transcript of an older and fuller catalogue of names. The list in Chronicles contains, according to its heading, the names of those who first settled in their possessions after the exile; the present list is of later date, and belongs to the times of Nehemiah.

3. The chief of the province — The chiefs or heads of families who represented the entire province of Judea in the time of Nehemiah. This providence was then one of the subdivisions of the Persian empire. But in the cities of Judah — Rather, and in the cities of Judah. The list contains the names of chief fathers dwelling in other cities of the province as well as in Jerusalem. See verses 25-36. Israel — This word here denotes the entire body of the covenant people, (the laity, so to speak,) exclusive of the four special classes next named.

LIST OF THE CHIEFS OF THE PROVINCE, 3-16.

A comparison of this list with that of 1 Chronicles 9, (where see notes,) shows that they both agree in their plan, and in a considerable number of their names. The differences are too many to allow the opinion that the lists are substantially identical, and that each is an imperfect transcript of an older and fuller catalogue of names. The list in Chronicles contains, according to its heading, the names of those who first settled in their possessions after the exile; the present list is of later date, and belongs to the times of Nehemiah.

3. The chief of the province — The chiefs or heads of families who represented the entire province of Judea in the time of Nehemiah. This providence was then one of the subdivisions of the Persian empire. But in the cities of Judah — Rather, and in the cities of Judah. The list contains the names of chief fathers dwelling in other cities of the province as well as in Jerusalem. See verses 25-36. Israel — This word here denotes the entire body of the covenant people, (the laity, so to speak,) exclusive of the four special classes next named.

Verse 14. Mighty men of valour] Noted for strength of body, and military courage.

14. Son of one of the great men — So the Septuagint and Vulgate read, but incorrectly. The Hebrew is to be taken as a proper name, son of Haggedolim.

LIST OF THE CHIEFS OF THE PROVINCE, 3-16.

A comparison of this list with that of 1 Chronicles 9, (where see notes,) shows that they both agree in their plan, and in a considerable number of their names. The differences are too many to allow the opinion that the lists are substantially identical, and that each is an imperfect transcript of an older and fuller catalogue of names. The list in Chronicles contains, according to its heading, the names of those who first settled in their possessions after the exile; the present list is of later date, and belongs to the times of Nehemiah.

3. The chief of the province — The chiefs or heads of families who represented the entire province of Judea in the time of Nehemiah. This providence was then one of the subdivisions of the Persian empire. But in the cities of Judah — Rather, and in the cities of Judah. The list contains the names of chief fathers dwelling in other cities of the province as well as in Jerusalem. See verses 25-36. Israel — This word here denotes the entire body of the covenant people, (the laity, so to speak,) exclusive of the four special classes next named.

V. 16. Outward-For those things belonging to the temple and its service, which were to be done without it, or abroad in the country, as the gathering in of the voluntary contributions, or other necessary provision out of the several parts of the land.

Verse 16. And Shabbethai] This verse, with verses 20, 21, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, and 35, are all wanting in the Septuagint and the whole chapter is wanting in the Arabic, the translator not being concerned in Jewish genealogies.

The outward business] Calmet supposes that he provided the victuals for the priests, victims for the sacrifices, the sacerdotal vestments, the sacred vessels, and other necessaries for the service of the temple.

Verse 16. The outward business of the house of God — For those things belonging to the temple and its service, which were to be done without it, or abroad in the country, as the gathering in of the voluntary contributions, or other necessary provisions, out of the several parts of the land.

16. The outward business of the house of God — Not the same as “the outward business over Israel,” which was done in the capacity of “officers and judges.” 1 Chronicles 26:29. It was a business that had special relation to the temple, but its exact nature is at present matter of conjecture. We naturally suppose that it consisted in care for the buildings and furniture, and the collection and arrangement of provisions for the temple service.

V. 17. To begin-In the publick and solemn prayers and praises, which were constantly joined with the morning and evening sacrifice, at which the singers were present, and praised God with a psalm or hymn which, this man began.

Verse 17. The principal to begin the thanksgiving] The precentor, pitcher of the tune, or master-singer.

Verse 17. To begin the thanksgiving in prayer — In the public and solemn prayers and praises, which were constantly joined with the morning and evening sacrifice, at which the singers were present, and praised God with a psalm or hymn, which this man began.

17. The principal to begin the thanksgiving — He was the precentor and chief musician, like Asaph, mentioned in 1 Chronicles 16:5. Bakbukiah the second — Second in rank; next in position and authority to Mattaniah.

V. 21. The Nethinims dwelt in Ophel-Which was upon the wall of Jerusalem, because they were to do the servile work of the temple: therefore they were to be posted near it, that they might be ready to attend.

Verse 21. The Nethinims dwelt in Ophel — Which was upon the wall of Jerusalem, because they were to do the servile work of the temple; therefore they were to be posted near it, that they might be ready to attend.

21. Dwelt in Ophel — See on Nehemiah 3:26.

Verse 22. The overseer also of the Levites] dyqp pekid, the visitant, the inspector; translated episkopov, bishop, both by the Septuagint and Vulgate.

Verse 22. The sons of Asaph were over the business of the house of God — Were to take care at Jerusalem for the supply of such things as were necessary for the temple and the service of God, from time to time, while others minded the outward business, verse 16. And this office was very proper for them, both as they were Levites, to whose care those things belonged; and as they were singers, who were not to come up to Jerusalem by turns, as other Levites, and as the priests did, but were constantly to reside there, and therefore were more capable of minding this business. Besides, their employment was not so frequent nor so great as some others were, and therefore they had more leisure for it.

Verse 23. It was the king’s commandment] By the king some understand David, and others Artaxerxes. It is most probable that it was the latter; who wished that a provision should be made for these, a part of whose office was to offer up prayers also, as well as praises. For we know that Darius made an ample provision for the priests, that they might offer sacrifices of sweet savour unto the God of heaven; and pray for the life of the king and of his sons, Ezra 6:10. Some have thought that they had been Jewish singers employed in the service of the Persian king, to whom he had given a salary, and to whom he wished still to continue the same.

Verse 23. It was the king’s commandment, &c. — That is, as it is generally thought, the commandment of the king of Persia, who, out of his great munificence, gave it for their better support, it being common in all countries to have a particular regard for those who sung hymns in praise of their gods. Houbigant renders the words, was at the king’s hand, in the next verse, was the king’s minister.

23. The king’s commandment — The king here referred to is not David, who originally arranged and made provision for the Levites, (1 Chronicles 23-26,) but the Persian king, Artaxerxes, who gave commandment concerning them to Ezra. Compare his decree, Ezra 7:12-26. A certain portion — hnma, a firm, or sure agreement, a covenant. The English version gives the view of many interpreters, who understand that a stipulated allowance of food was granted to the singers. But the Hebrew may be thus literally rendered: and an agreement was upon the singers, a matter of day in its day. That is, the singers were bound by a settled agreement to perform a certain amount of service on each particular day. Each day had its own matter of service for these singers. Perhaps, however, the thought of allowance may also be included.

V. 24. Was, &c.-Or, on the king’s part, to determine civil causes and controversies between man and man, by the laws of that kingdom; between the king and people; as in matters of tribute, or grievances.

Verse 24. Pethahiah-was at the king’s hand] He was the governor appointed by the Persian king over the Jewish nation in those matters in which the civil government interfered with Jewish concerns. He no doubt fixed, levied, and received the tribute.

Verse 24. Pethahiah was at the king’s hand — Or on the king’s part, to determine civil causes and controversies between man and man by the laws of that kingdom; between the king and people, as in matters of tribute or grievances.

24. Pethahiah… at the king’s hand — That is, at the court of the Persian monarch. He was at the king’s hand as a private counsellor, having in charge all the interests of the Jewish people. He was allowed frequent access to the king, and so in all matters concerning the people he must have been a most important and responsible agent and representative of his nation at the seat of government.

25. And for the villages — Or we may render, now in respect to the villages. The writer thus turns to an enumeration of the towns or villages of the province in which children of Judah and Benjamin dwelt. Kirjath-arba — The same is Hebron. See on Joshua 10:3. Dibon is probably identical with the Dimonah of Joshua 15:22, and Jekabzeel with the Kabzeel of Joshua 15:21; towns in the extreme south of Judah, whose sites have not been clearly identified.

Verse 26. And at Jeshua] This city is nowhere else mentioned.

26-35. On Moladah, see Joshua 15:26. Beer-sheba — Josh, 15:28. Ziklag — 1 Samuel 27:6. Jarmuth — Joshua 15:35. Lachish — Joshua 10:3. Valley of Hinnom — Joshua 15. 8. Geba — Joshua 18:24. Michmash — 1 Samuel 13:2. Aija and Beth-el — Joshua 7:2. Anathoth — Joshua 21:18. Nob — 1 Samuel 21:1. Ananiah — Perhaps the modern Beit Hanina, some three miles northwest of Jerusalem. Ramah — Joshua 18:25. Gittaim — 2 Samuel 4:3. Hadid — Perhaps the modern Haditheh, a few miles east of Lod, or Lydda. Neballat — The modern Beit Nebala, a little northeast of Lod. Lod and Ono — Lod is the Lydda of the New Testament, (see on Acts 9:32,) and Ono is probably to be sought at Kefr Anna, a few miles north of it. See on Nehemiah 6:2. The valley of craftsmen is, perhaps, identical with the plain of Ono, mentioned Nehemiah 6:2. Compare 1 Chronicles 4:14. The other towns mentioned in this section are unknown.

26-35. On Moladah, see Joshua 15:26. Beer-sheba — Josh, 15:28. Ziklag — 1 Samuel 27:6. Jarmuth — Joshua 15:35. Lachish — Joshua 10:3. Valley of Hinnom — Joshua 15. 8. Geba — Joshua 18:24. Michmash — 1 Samuel 13:2. Aija and Beth-el — Joshua 7:2. Anathoth — Joshua 21:18. Nob — 1 Samuel 21:1. Ananiah — Perhaps the modern Beit Hanina, some three miles northwest of Jerusalem. Ramah — Joshua 18:25. Gittaim — 2 Samuel 4:3. Hadid — Perhaps the modern Haditheh, a few miles east of Lod, or Lydda. Neballat — The modern Beit Nebala, a little northeast of Lod. Lod and Ono — Lod is the Lydda of the New Testament, (see on Acts 9:32,) and Ono is probably to be sought at Kefr Anna, a few miles north of it. See on Nehemiah 6:2. The valley of craftsmen is, perhaps, identical with the plain of Ono, mentioned Nehemiah 6:2. Compare 1 Chronicles 4:14. The other towns mentioned in this section are unknown.

Verse 28. Mekonah] This city is also unknown.

26-35. On Moladah, see Joshua 15:26. Beer-sheba — Josh, 15:28. Ziklag — 1 Samuel 27:6. Jarmuth — Joshua 15:35. Lachish — Joshua 10:3. Valley of Hinnom — Joshua 15. 8. Geba — Joshua 18:24. Michmash — 1 Samuel 13:2. Aija and Beth-el — Joshua 7:2. Anathoth — Joshua 21:18. Nob — 1 Samuel 21:1. Ananiah — Perhaps the modern Beit Hanina, some three miles northwest of Jerusalem. Ramah — Joshua 18:25. Gittaim — 2 Samuel 4:3. Hadid — Perhaps the modern Haditheh, a few miles east of Lod, or Lydda. Neballat — The modern Beit Nebala, a little northeast of Lod. Lod and Ono — Lod is the Lydda of the New Testament, (see on Acts 9:32,) and Ono is probably to be sought at Kefr Anna, a few miles north of it. See on Nehemiah 6:2. The valley of craftsmen is, perhaps, identical with the plain of Ono, mentioned Nehemiah 6:2. Compare 1 Chronicles 4:14. The other towns mentioned in this section are unknown.

26-35. On Moladah, see Joshua 15:26. Beer-sheba — Josh, 15:28. Ziklag — 1 Samuel 27:6. Jarmuth — Joshua 15:35. Lachish — Joshua 10:3. Valley of Hinnom — Joshua 15. 8. Geba — Joshua 18:24. Michmash — 1 Samuel 13:2. Aija and Beth-el — Joshua 7:2. Anathoth — Joshua 21:18. Nob — 1 Samuel 21:1. Ananiah — Perhaps the modern Beit Hanina, some three miles northwest of Jerusalem. Ramah — Joshua 18:25. Gittaim — 2 Samuel 4:3. Hadid — Perhaps the modern Haditheh, a few miles east of Lod, or Lydda. Neballat — The modern Beit Nebala, a little northeast of Lod. Lod and Ono — Lod is the Lydda of the New Testament, (see on Acts 9:32,) and Ono is probably to be sought at Kefr Anna, a few miles north of it. See on Nehemiah 6:2. The valley of craftsmen is, perhaps, identical with the plain of Ono, mentioned Nehemiah 6:2. Compare 1 Chronicles 4:14. The other towns mentioned in this section are unknown.

26-35. On Moladah, see Joshua 15:26. Beer-sheba — Josh, 15:28. Ziklag — 1 Samuel 27:6. Jarmuth — Joshua 15:35. Lachish — Joshua 10:3. Valley of Hinnom — Joshua 15. 8. Geba — Joshua 18:24. Michmash — 1 Samuel 13:2. Aija and Beth-el — Joshua 7:2. Anathoth — Joshua 21:18. Nob — 1 Samuel 21:1. Ananiah — Perhaps the modern Beit Hanina, some three miles northwest of Jerusalem. Ramah — Joshua 18:25. Gittaim — 2 Samuel 4:3. Hadid — Perhaps the modern Haditheh, a few miles east of Lod, or Lydda. Neballat — The modern Beit Nebala, a little northeast of Lod. Lod and Ono — Lod is the Lydda of the New Testament, (see on Acts 9:32,) and Ono is probably to be sought at Kefr Anna, a few miles north of it. See on Nehemiah 6:2. The valley of craftsmen is, perhaps, identical with the plain of Ono, mentioned Nehemiah 6:2. Compare 1 Chronicles 4:14. The other towns mentioned in this section are unknown.

Verse 31. Geba] Probably the same as Gibeah of Saul.

26-35. On Moladah, see Joshua 15:26. Beer-sheba — Josh, 15:28. Ziklag — 1 Samuel 27:6. Jarmuth — Joshua 15:35. Lachish — Joshua 10:3. Valley of Hinnom — Joshua 15. 8. Geba — Joshua 18:24. Michmash — 1 Samuel 13:2. Aija and Beth-el — Joshua 7:2. Anathoth — Joshua 21:18. Nob — 1 Samuel 21:1. Ananiah — Perhaps the modern Beit Hanina, some three miles northwest of Jerusalem. Ramah — Joshua 18:25. Gittaim — 2 Samuel 4:3. Hadid — Perhaps the modern Haditheh, a few miles east of Lod, or Lydda. Neballat — The modern Beit Nebala, a little northeast of Lod. Lod and Ono — Lod is the Lydda of the New Testament, (see on Acts 9:32,) and Ono is probably to be sought at Kefr Anna, a few miles north of it. See on Nehemiah 6:2. The valley of craftsmen is, perhaps, identical with the plain of Ono, mentioned Nehemiah 6:2. Compare 1 Chronicles 4:14. The other towns mentioned in this section are unknown.

Verse 32. Ananiah] No city of this name is known.

26-35. On Moladah, see Joshua 15:26. Beer-sheba — Josh, 15:28. Ziklag — 1 Samuel 27:6. Jarmuth — Joshua 15:35. Lachish — Joshua 10:3. Valley of Hinnom — Joshua 15. 8. Geba — Joshua 18:24. Michmash — 1 Samuel 13:2. Aija and Beth-el — Joshua 7:2. Anathoth — Joshua 21:18. Nob — 1 Samuel 21:1. Ananiah — Perhaps the modern Beit Hanina, some three miles northwest of Jerusalem. Ramah — Joshua 18:25. Gittaim — 2 Samuel 4:3. Hadid — Perhaps the modern Haditheh, a few miles east of Lod, or Lydda. Neballat — The modern Beit Nebala, a little northeast of Lod. Lod and Ono — Lod is the Lydda of the New Testament, (see on Acts 9:32,) and Ono is probably to be sought at Kefr Anna, a few miles north of it. See on Nehemiah 6:2. The valley of craftsmen is, perhaps, identical with the plain of Ono, mentioned Nehemiah 6:2. Compare 1 Chronicles 4:14. The other towns mentioned in this section are unknown.

Verse 33. Hadid] This place is also unknown. Neballat] Also unknown.

26-35. On Moladah, see Joshua 15:26. Beer-sheba — Josh, 15:28. Ziklag — 1 Samuel 27:6. Jarmuth — Joshua 15:35. Lachish — Joshua 10:3. Valley of Hinnom — Joshua 15. 8. Geba — Joshua 18:24. Michmash — 1 Samuel 13:2. Aija and Beth-el — Joshua 7:2. Anathoth — Joshua 21:18. Nob — 1 Samuel 21:1. Ananiah — Perhaps the modern Beit Hanina, some three miles northwest of Jerusalem. Ramah — Joshua 18:25. Gittaim — 2 Samuel 4:3. Hadid — Perhaps the modern Haditheh, a few miles east of Lod, or Lydda. Neballat — The modern Beit Nebala, a little northeast of Lod. Lod and Ono — Lod is the Lydda of the New Testament, (see on Acts 9:32,) and Ono is probably to be sought at Kefr Anna, a few miles north of it. See on Nehemiah 6:2. The valley of craftsmen is, perhaps, identical with the plain of Ono, mentioned Nehemiah 6:2. Compare 1 Chronicles 4:14. The other towns mentioned in this section are unknown.

26-35. On Moladah, see Joshua 15:26. Beer-sheba — Josh, 15:28. Ziklag — 1 Samuel 27:6. Jarmuth — Joshua 15:35. Lachish — Joshua 10:3. Valley of Hinnom — Joshua 15. 8. Geba — Joshua 18:24. Michmash — 1 Samuel 13:2. Aija and Beth-el — Joshua 7:2. Anathoth — Joshua 21:18. Nob — 1 Samuel 21:1. Ananiah — Perhaps the modern Beit Hanina, some three miles northwest of Jerusalem. Ramah — Joshua 18:25. Gittaim — 2 Samuel 4:3. Hadid — Perhaps the modern Haditheh, a few miles east of Lod, or Lydda. Neballat — The modern Beit Nebala, a little northeast of Lod. Lod and Ono — Lod is the Lydda of the New Testament, (see on Acts 9:32,) and Ono is probably to be sought at Kefr Anna, a few miles north of it. See on Nehemiah 6:2. The valley of craftsmen is, perhaps, identical with the plain of Ono, mentioned Nehemiah 6:2. Compare 1 Chronicles 4:14. The other towns mentioned in this section are unknown.

Verse 35. Lod, and Ono] These towns were built by the sons of Elpaal, 1 Chronicles 8:12.

The valley of craftsmen.] See 1 Chronicles 4:14. Probably this latter town was built in this valley.

26-35. On Moladah, see Joshua 15:26. Beer-sheba — Josh, 15:28. Ziklag — 1 Samuel 27:6. Jarmuth — Joshua 15:35. Lachish — Joshua 10:3. Valley of Hinnom — Joshua 15. 8. Geba — Joshua 18:24. Michmash — 1 Samuel 13:2. Aija and Beth-el — Joshua 7:2. Anathoth — Joshua 21:18. Nob — 1 Samuel 21:1. Ananiah — Perhaps the modern Beit Hanina, some three miles northwest of Jerusalem. Ramah — Joshua 18:25. Gittaim — 2 Samuel 4:3. Hadid — Perhaps the modern Haditheh, a few miles east of Lod, or Lydda. Neballat — The modern Beit Nebala, a little northeast of Lod. Lod and Ono — Lod is the Lydda of the New Testament, (see on Acts 9:32,) and Ono is probably to be sought at Kefr Anna, a few miles north of it. See on Nehemiah 6:2. The valley of craftsmen is, perhaps, identical with the plain of Ono, mentioned Nehemiah 6:2. Compare 1 Chronicles 4:14. The other towns mentioned in this section are unknown.

V. 36. Divisions-Or, for the Levites (those who were not settled in Jerusalem) there were divisions, places appointed for them, and distributed among them. Thus were they settled free and easy, tho’ few and poor. And they might have been happy, but for that general lukewarmness, with which they are charged by the prophet Malachi, who prophesied about this time and in whom prophecy ceased for some ages, ‘till it revived in the great prophet.

Verse 36. And of the Levites were divisions] The Levites had their dwellings in the divisions of Judah and Benjamin. This is probably the meaning: the Syriac says, They had the half of Judah and Benjamin; which is not likely.

THAT the people whose hearts were now turned towards the Lord, would make the best provision for the support of God’s work, and all those engaged in it, we may naturally suppose; but this could not be very great, as the complete service was not yet established, and the Levites themselves were few in number.

NEHEMIAH

Verse 36. Of the Levites were divisions — Or, for the Levites (those who were not settled in Jerusalem) there were divisions; places appointed for them and distributed among them. Thus were they settled free and easy, though few and poor. And they might have been happy but for that general lukewarmness with which they are charged by the Prophet Malachi, who prophesied about this time, and in whom prophecy ceased for some ages, till it revived in the great prophet.

36. Divisions in Judah, and in Benjamin — Rather, divisions of Judah to Benjamin. That is, divisions of Levites that had previously belonged to the tribe of Judah by having their homes in that tribe, were now assigned to Benjamin. This was probably done to equalize or rectify the proportion of Levites to each tribe.