Wesleyan Heritage Library Search /

1 John · Chapter 4

21 verses
1

Beloved, believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God: because many false prophets are gone out into the world.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 408 of the original edition

V. 1. Believe not every spirit-Whereby any teacher is actuated. But try the spirits-By the rule which follows. We are to try all spirits by the written word: "To the law and to the testimony!" If any man speak not according to these, the spirit which actuates him is not of God.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 52 of the original edition

Verse 1. Beloved, believe not every spirit] Do not be forward to believe every teacher to be a man sent of God. As in those early times every teacher professed to be inspired by the Spirit of God, because all the prophets had come thus accredited, the term spirit was used to express the man who pretended to be and teach under the Spirit’s influence. See 1 Corinthians 12:1-12; 1 Timothy 4:1.

Try the Spirits] dokimazete ta pneumata. Put these teachers to the proof. Try them by that testimony which is known to have come from the Spirit of God, the word of revelation already given.

Many false prophets] Teachers not inspired by the Spirit of God, are gone out into the world-among the Jewish people particularly, and among them who are carnal and have not the Spirit.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 849 of the original edition

Verse 1. Because the Gnostics and other heretics, in the first age, to gain the greater credit to their erroneous doctrines, assumed to themselves the character and authority of inspired teachers, John put his disciples in mind, (1 John 2:27,) that they had an unction from the Holy Spirit, by which they were enabled to judge with certainty, both of teachers and of their doctrine. He therefore, in this chapter, commands them not to believe rashly every teacher who pretended to be inspired, but to try the inspiration by which any preacher professed to speak, whether it was from God or from evil spirits; that after trial they might know whom it was their duty to attend to, and whom they ought to disregard and reject. And to secure them, as far as possible, from being deceived, he especially desires them to consider whether the teacher, who came to them, pretending to inspiration, held the great and fundamental doctrines of the gospel, which all the teachers, really inspired of God, regularly and uniformly maintained. His words may be paraphrased as follows: Believe not every spirit — By which any teacher is, or professes to be, actuated: or, believe not every teacher who pretends to be inspired by the Spirit of God; but try the spirits — Namely, whether they are of God — By the rule which God hath given. We are to try all spirits by the written word: To the law and to the testimony! If any man speak not according to these, the spirit which actuates him is not of God. Because many false prophets — Or false teachers; are gone forth into the world — With an intention to draw disciples after them.

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 383 of the original edition

Verse 1-3. Believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God. Whether those teachers believe that Christ is come in the flesh, which to the present hour the unbelieving jews deny. Try them by the faith of all the holy apostles and confessors, whether they confess that Christ is the Son of the living God. Whether he be the glory that shone in the ancient church, and dwelt on the mercyseat. The Eternal Son, the Word, the Wisdom of God, crucified for sinners. False teachers will neither follow the crucified Redeemer, nor suffer for his sake. The cross offers no charms to the concupiscence of such apostles.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 364 of the original edition

THE TRYING OF THE ANTICHRISTIC SPIRITS, 1-21.

1. The three condemnatory tests—non-confession of a human Jesus; worldliness; the not hearing us, the apostolic witnesses, 1-6.

1. Believe not every spirit—In this, the apostolic day of supernatural manifestations there are false inspirations, as well as true. There are demoniac instigations as well as true revelations. The term Spirit of God, in the second verse, shows that by spirits are antithetically meant, not merely human intellects or personalities, nor a temper or disposition of human minds. The errors of the errorists are referred back to supernatural sources; though the word spirits spontaneously, in verses 2 and 3, becomes a designation of the man himself inspired by the spirit. So the demoniac of Gadara becomes identified with the demon possessing him. See notes on Mark 5:1-20; 2 Thessalonians 2:9. False prophets— Each possessed by, and identified with, his own spirit, and teaching his own particular error. Gone out—From their chief commissioner, Satan. The intensity of John’s feelings in regard to these antichristic emissaries appears from his reference to the same deceivers in his second epistle, verse 7. There they have entered into the world, and each one is antichrist, and earnest warnings are given for a profound avoidance of them.

2

Hereby know ye the Spirit of God: Every spirit that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is of God:

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 408 of the original edition

V. 2. Every spirit-Or teacher.

Which confesseth-Both with heart and voice.

Jesus Christ, who is come in the flesh, is of God-This his coming presupposes, contains, and draws after it, the whole doctrine of Christ.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 52 of the original edition

Verse 2. Hereby know ye the Spirit of God] We know that the man who teaches that Jesus Christ is the promised Messiah, and that he is come in the flesh, is of God-is inspired by the Divine Spirit; for no man can call Jesus Lord but by the Holy Ghost.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 850 of the original edition

Verse 2. Hereby — By the following plain mark; know ye the Spirit of God — In a teacher. Every spirit — Of a teacher; that confesseth that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh, is of God — Doddridge, with many other commentators, reads this clause, Every spirit that confesseth Jesus Christ, who is come in the flesh, is of God: that is, that confesseth him to be the Messiah, the Son of God, the Saviour of the world, and that both with heart and voice, sincerely believing him to be such, and behaving to him and confessing him as such, though this might expose them to the loss of all things, even of their property, liberty, and lives. This must be acknowledged to be a perfectly Scriptural and very proper mark of trial, proving those in whom it was found to be possessed of the Spirit of God and of Christ. Nevertheless, it must be acknowledged, though the original words, o omologei Ihsoun Criston en sarki elhluqota, might bear this rendering, they much more favour the sense given them in our translation, signifying, literally and exactly, that confesseth Jesus Christ hath come in the flesh. This imports two things: 1st, That Jesus is the Christ, whose coming was foretold by the Jewish prophets, in opposition to the unbelieving Jews; a truth which those who confessed, whether in Judea or in the Gentile countries, exposed themselves to the danger of having their goods spoiled, and their bodies imprisoned, if not also tortured and put to death. So that those who voluntarily made this confession, manifested that they preferred Christ and his gospel to all other things whatever. The clause imports, 2d, That this great personage, the Messiah, the Son of God, had really come in the flesh, and had a real human nature, in opposition to a sect which arose very early in the Christian Church, called the Docetæ, who would not allow that Christ had a real body, and that he really suffered, died, and rose again. This sect St. John seems to have had in his eye throughout this epistle. Hence, in the very beginning of it, he speaks of seeing, hearing, and handling Christ; and here, to the fundamental article of Jesus’s being the Messiah, he adds, that he came in the flesh; with which doctrine his atoning for sin by the sacrifice of himself, and his rising from the dead, the first-fruits of them that sleep, were closely and necessarily connected, and therefore the acknowledgment of it was a point of the greatest importance.

The Socinians indeed contend, that to confess Jesus Christ hath come in the flesh, means simply to confess that he was a mere man: and from this they infer that he had no existence before he was conceived of his mother. In proof of their sense of the clause, they cite Hebrews 2:14, where the writer says he partook of our flesh and blood. Now, though it may be true that these words import nothing more than that Christ was a man, like other men, St. John’s words, hath come in the flesh, have evidently a more extensive meaning. For, as Bishop Horsley observes, the sense of a proposition ariseth, not from the meaning of a single word contained in it, but from the union of the whole into one sentence, especially if that union suggests any circumstance by which the sense of the proposition is modified. This is the case of the clause, hath come in the flesh; words which, while they specify the manner of his coming, imply that he might have come in a different manner if he had pleased. Accordingly the apostle hath used the verb to come in that sense 1 John 5:6. This is he who came by water and blood, even Jesus Christ; not by water only, but by the water and the blood. For his meaning plainly is, that Jesus came attested as the Christ by water and blood jointly, although he might have come attested by either of these separately; and that Jesus existed as the Christ before he came attested by the water and the blood. Thus the clause, hath come in the flesh, implies that he might have come in another manner than in the flesh, namely, in the form of God, as mentioned <501706> Philippians 2:6,

7. It implies that he existed before he came in the flesh, and chose to come in that manner, rather than in any other; consequently that he is more than a mere man. That Jesus Christ might have come in another manner, was the opinion of Clemens Romanus, one of the apostolical fathers mentioned Philippians 4:3: for in his epistle to the Corinthians, he saith, “The sceptre of the majesty of God, our Lord Jesus Christ, came not in the pride of pomp and arrogance, although he had it in his power; but in humility, as the Holy Spirit spake concerning him.” See Macknight, and Bishop Horsley’s 5th letter to Priestley.

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 383 of the original edition

Verse 1-3. Believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God. Whether those teachers believe that Christ is come in the flesh, which to the present hour the unbelieving jews deny. Try them by the faith of all the holy apostles and confessors, whether they confess that Christ is the Son of the living God. Whether he be the glory that shone in the ancient church, and dwelt on the mercyseat. The Eternal Son, the Word, the Wisdom of God, crucified for sinners. False teachers will neither follow the crucified Redeemer, nor suffer for his sake. The cross offers no charms to the concupiscence of such apostles.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 364 of the original edition

2. Hereby—First test of a true spirit. This test is aimed at the Docetist, who denied the flesh and body of Christ, and made him a phantom. Every spirit… of God—The apostle’s language is seemingly sweeping. Is the spirit that confesses Jesus come in the flesh, and yet denies other truths, truly of God? Or, as Augustine (quoted by Wordsworth) asks: “Arius, and Eunomius, and Macedonius, and Nestorius, own that Jesus came in the flesh; are not they, therefore, of God?” To this Augustine answers: “Those heresiarchs did not, in fact, confess Christ come in the flesh, because, whatever they might do in words, they in their works denied him. (Titus 1:16.) They have not charity because they have not unity;” that is, unity with the Church. Wordsworth gives a different answer, which is in effect, that to confess Christ come in the flesh is to confess him as Messiah, with all that embraces; namely, his divine atonement for our sins. Compare our notes on verse 15 and 1 John 5:1. Perhaps the apostle would say, that whatever error Arius or other heretic believed, he derived from a false spirit; but whatever truth he held, as the incarnation of Christ, came from a good spirit and was of God. The spirit, here, is not wholly the man, but the inspiration from good or evil in the man. But our own view is that the apostle is deciding between two claimants to being of God, the one denying and the other affirming that Jesus is come in the flesh; and he pronounces for the latter. So that of the two sides he that confesseth is of God.

3

And every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh is not of God: and this is that spirit of antichrist, whereof ye have heard that it should come; and even now already is it in the world.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 408 of the original edition

V. 3. Ye have heard-From our Lord and us, that it cometh.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 53 of the original edition

Verse 3. Every spirit] Every teacher, that confesseth not Jesus, is not of God-has not been inspired by God. The words en sarki elhluqota, is come in the flesh, are wanting in AB, several others, both the Syriac, the Polyglot Arabic, Æthiopic, Coptic, Armenian, and Vulgate; in Origen, Cyril, Theodoret, Irenæus, and others. Griesbach has left them out of the text.

Spirit of antichrist] All the opponents of Christ’s incarnation, and consequently of his passion, death, and resurrection, and the benefits to be derived from them.

Ye have heard that it should come] See 2 Thessalonians 2:7. Even now already is it in the world.] Is working powerfully both among the Jews and Gentiles.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 851 of the original edition

Verse 3. Every spirit that confesseth not that Jesus Christ is come in the flesh — That doth not acknowledge him to be the true Messiah, as above observed, and that he came in that particular manner, though he might have come otherwise; is not of Gods — “To determine whether the Socinian interpretation of the clause, hath come in the flesh, expresses the apostle’s meaning, let that interpretation be substituted for the expression of which it is the interpretation, and the passages under consideration will run thus: verse 2, Every spirit, every teacher, calling himself inspired, who confesseth Jesus Christ hath come a mere man, is from God; verse 3, And every spirit who doth not confess Jesus Christ hath come a mere man, is not from God. Wherefore, as St. John is here giving marks by which true and false teachers were to be distinguished, if the Socinian sense of the phrase, hath come in the flesh, be just, he hath made it the mark of a true teacher, that he confesseth Jesus Christ as a mere man; and the mark of a false teacher, that he doth not confess Jesus Christ as a mere man, but affirmeth that he is more than a mere man; consequently, by so doing, St. John has condemned himself as a false teacher; because, having declared (1 John 4:15; 5:5) that Jesus Christ is the Son of God, he hath confessed that he is more than a mere man.” And also in his gospel, having told us, (John 1:14,) that the Word (who he had said, verse 1, was with God and was God) was made flesh and dwelt among us, and they beheld his glory, the glory as of the only-begotten of the Father, “he hath certainly confessed that Jesus Christ is more than a mere man: for whose glory did the apostles behold, if it was not the glory of the Word made flesh, the only-begotten of the Father, full of grace and truth? Wherefore, John having confessed that Jesus is the only-begotten Son of God, he cannot be supposed to have branded those teachers as deceivers, who did not confess Jesus Christ to be a mere man, but affirmed him to be more than a man; because, by so doing, he would have condemned himself as a false teacher.” And this is that spirit of antichrist which ye have heard, &c. — “From this, as well as from John 2:18, it appears that antichrist is not any particular person, nor any particular succession of persons in the church, but a general name for all false teachers in every age, who disseminate doctrines contrary to those taught by the apostles; especially if these doctrines have a tendency to derogate from Christ’s character and actions as the Saviour of the world.” — Macknight.

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 383 of the original edition

Verse 1-3. Believe not every spirit, but try the spirits whether they are of God. Whether those teachers believe that Christ is come in the flesh, which to the present hour the unbelieving jews deny. Try them by the faith of all the holy apostles and confessors, whether they confess that Christ is the Son of the living God. Whether he be the glory that shone in the ancient church, and dwelt on the mercyseat. The Eternal Son, the Word, the Wisdom of God, crucified for sinners. False teachers will neither follow the crucified Redeemer, nor suffer for his sake. The cross offers no charms to the concupiscence of such apostles.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 365 of the original edition

3. Every spirit that confesseth not—The Vulgate has this remarkable reading of this verse: “Every spirit which separates Jesus is not of God.” This alludes to the heresy of Cerinthus, the contemporary of John, who taught that Jesus was merely the son of human parents, but that the Christ was an aeon, or superhuman being? who descended upon Jesus at his baptism; thus separating the person of Jesus. It would seem that the ancient Greek Church historian, Socrates, recognised this reading in ancient manuscripts, as well as Tertullian, Irenaeus, and Origen. But all the Greek MSS., and all the Versions except the Vulgate, have the present reading. That spirit of antichrist—The special doctrine of emphatically the antichrist, based on the affirmation that all evil is identical with matter. Should come—Was prophesied as to come immediately before the second advent. Already is it—See note on 1 John 2:18.

4

Ye are of God, little children, and have overcome them: because greater is he that is in you, than he that is in the world.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 408 of the original edition

V. 4. Ye have overcome these seducers, because greater is the Spirit of Christ that is in you than the spirit of antichrist that is in the world.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 53 of the original edition

Verse 4. Ye are of God] Ye are under the influence of the Divine Spirit, and have overcome them-your testimony, proceeding from the Spirit of Christ, has invalidated theirs which has proceeded from the influence of Satan; for greater is the Holy Spirit which is in you, than the spirit which is in the world.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 852 of the original edition

Verses 4-6. Ye — Who abide in the truth taught you from the beginning; are of God, and have overcome them — Namely, these seducers, in all their snares and delusions: that is, the doctrine to which you adhere has prevailed against those who deserve the name of antichrist, (as undoubtedly all who oppose the Christian interest in some measure did,) and as you have the true miraculous gifts of the Spirit among you, to which they falsely pretend, it is soon seen that the advantage is clearly on your side. Because greater is he that is in you — Namely, the Spirit of Christ; than he — The spirit of antichrist; that is in the world — The Son of God, who stands at the head of that interest in which you are embarked, and who aids you by the mighty communications of his Spirit, is infinitely too strong for Satan, the great head of the apostacy, and for all his confederates. Thus, the issue of the divine government will be, that truth and virtue shall be finally victorious over error and wickedness, because God, the Patron of truth and virtue, possesseth far greater power and wisdom than the evil spirits who promote error and wickedness. They — Those false teachers; are of the world — Of the number of those that know not God; therefore speak they of the world — From the principle, wisdom, and spirit, that actuate worldly men; and, of consequence, the world heareth them — Namely, with approbation. “Lest the faithful should be discouraged by the success which false teachers oftentimes have in spreading their errors, the apostle observes that their success arises generally from their accommodating their doctrines to the prejudices and evil inclinations of the world. Wherefore, from the prevalence of any doctrine no argument can be drawn in favour of its truth.” We — Apostles; are of God — Immediately taught and sent by him, and have approved ourselves to be so by such irresistible evidence, that I may now venture to say, he who knoweth God — And experiences the governing influence of his fear and love, heareth and regardeth us; but he who is not of God heareth not us — Neither believes nor obeys our word; but, by rejecting our testimony, attended as it is with such evidence, he proves himself destitute of all true religion. Hereby we know — From what is said verses 2-6; the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error — “This mark, by which St. John directed his disciples to judge of teachers, is not to be understood of their hearkening to the apostles personally, but of their receiving their doctrine with that submission which was due to persons inspired by the Spirit of God. Wherefore, though the apostles be all dead, yet as they still speak in their divinely-inspired writings, John, in this passage, declares that their writings are the test by which the disciples of Christ are to judge both of teachers and of their doctrine.”

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 365 of the original edition

4. Second test of antichristic spirits—worldliness. In the contest between the Church and the world, they are on the world’s side. Have overcome— By placing faith in Christ, the world’s conqueror. Note on 1 John 5:4. Them—The antichristic spirits, who are identified with the world. He… in you—God. In the world—Satan, as its inspirer and prince.

5

They are of the world: therefore speak they of the world, and the world heareth them.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 408 of the original edition

V. 5. They-Those false prophets.

Are of the world-Of the number of those that know not God. Therefore speak they of the world-From the same principle, wisdom, spirit; and, of consequence, the world heareth them-With approbation.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 852 of the original edition

Verses 4-6. Ye — Who abide in the truth taught you from the beginning; are of God, and have overcome them — Namely, these seducers, in all their snares and delusions: that is, the doctrine to which you adhere has prevailed against those who deserve the name of antichrist, (as undoubtedly all who oppose the Christian interest in some measure did,) and as you have the true miraculous gifts of the Spirit among you, to which they falsely pretend, it is soon seen that the advantage is clearly on your side. Because greater is he that is in you — Namely, the Spirit of Christ; than he — The spirit of antichrist; that is in the world — The Son of God, who stands at the head of that interest in which you are embarked, and who aids you by the mighty communications of his Spirit, is infinitely too strong for Satan, the great head of the apostacy, and for all his confederates. Thus, the issue of the divine government will be, that truth and virtue shall be finally victorious over error and wickedness, because God, the Patron of truth and virtue, possesseth far greater power and wisdom than the evil spirits who promote error and wickedness. They — Those false teachers; are of the world — Of the number of those that know not God; therefore speak they of the world — From the principle, wisdom, and spirit, that actuate worldly men; and, of consequence, the world heareth them — Namely, with approbation. “Lest the faithful should be discouraged by the success which false teachers oftentimes have in spreading their errors, the apostle observes that their success arises generally from their accommodating their doctrines to the prejudices and evil inclinations of the world. Wherefore, from the prevalence of any doctrine no argument can be drawn in favour of its truth.” We — Apostles; are of God — Immediately taught and sent by him, and have approved ourselves to be so by such irresistible evidence, that I may now venture to say, he who knoweth God — And experiences the governing influence of his fear and love, heareth and regardeth us; but he who is not of God heareth not us — Neither believes nor obeys our word; but, by rejecting our testimony, attended as it is with such evidence, he proves himself destitute of all true religion. Hereby we know — From what is said verses 2-6; the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error — “This mark, by which St. John directed his disciples to judge of teachers, is not to be understood of their hearkening to the apostles personally, but of their receiving their doctrine with that submission which was due to persons inspired by the Spirit of God. Wherefore, though the apostles be all dead, yet as they still speak in their divinely-inspired writings, John, in this passage, declares that their writings are the test by which the disciples of Christ are to judge both of teachers and of their doctrine.”

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 365 of the original edition

5. Speak they of (rather from) the world—They draw their inspiration, not from Christ, but from the world-spirit; and their doctrines are but the expression of the world’s feelings; and themselves are the organs of the Satan-inspired world.

6

We are of God: he that knoweth God heareth us; he that is not of God heareth not us. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 408 of the original edition

V. 6. We-Apostles.

Are of God-Immediately taught, and sent by him. Hereby we know-From what is said, 1 John 4:2-6.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 53 of the original edition

Verse 6. We are of God] We, apostles, have the Spirit of God, and speak and teach by that Spirit. He that knoweth God-who has a truly spiritual discernment, heareth us-acknowledges that our doctrine is from God; that it is spiritual, and leads from earth to heaven.

Hereby know we the Spirit of truth] The doctrine and teacher most prized and followed by worldly men, and by the gay, giddy, and garish multitude, are not from God; they savour of the flesh, lay on no restraints, prescribe no cross-bearing, and leave every one in full possession of his heart’s lusts and easily besetting sins. And by this, false doctrine and false teachers are easily discerned.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 852 of the original edition

Verses 4-6. Ye — Who abide in the truth taught you from the beginning; are of God, and have overcome them — Namely, these seducers, in all their snares and delusions: that is, the doctrine to which you adhere has prevailed against those who deserve the name of antichrist, (as undoubtedly all who oppose the Christian interest in some measure did,) and as you have the true miraculous gifts of the Spirit among you, to which they falsely pretend, it is soon seen that the advantage is clearly on your side. Because greater is he that is in you — Namely, the Spirit of Christ; than he — The spirit of antichrist; that is in the world — The Son of God, who stands at the head of that interest in which you are embarked, and who aids you by the mighty communications of his Spirit, is infinitely too strong for Satan, the great head of the apostacy, and for all his confederates. Thus, the issue of the divine government will be, that truth and virtue shall be finally victorious over error and wickedness, because God, the Patron of truth and virtue, possesseth far greater power and wisdom than the evil spirits who promote error and wickedness. They — Those false teachers; are of the world — Of the number of those that know not God; therefore speak they of the world — From the principle, wisdom, and spirit, that actuate worldly men; and, of consequence, the world heareth them — Namely, with approbation. “Lest the faithful should be discouraged by the success which false teachers oftentimes have in spreading their errors, the apostle observes that their success arises generally from their accommodating their doctrines to the prejudices and evil inclinations of the world. Wherefore, from the prevalence of any doctrine no argument can be drawn in favour of its truth.” We — Apostles; are of God — Immediately taught and sent by him, and have approved ourselves to be so by such irresistible evidence, that I may now venture to say, he who knoweth God — And experiences the governing influence of his fear and love, heareth and regardeth us; but he who is not of God heareth not us — Neither believes nor obeys our word; but, by rejecting our testimony, attended as it is with such evidence, he proves himself destitute of all true religion. Hereby we know — From what is said verses 2-6; the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error — “This mark, by which St. John directed his disciples to judge of teachers, is not to be understood of their hearkening to the apostles personally, but of their receiving their doctrine with that submission which was due to persons inspired by the Spirit of God. Wherefore, though the apostles be all dead, yet as they still speak in their divinely-inspired writings, John, in this passage, declares that their writings are the test by which the disciples of Christ are to judge both of teachers and of their doctrine.”

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 383 of the original edition

Ver. 6. Hereby know we the spirit of truth, and the spirit of error. The one preaches and confesses Christ: the other, which denies him, is the spirit of antichrist, a lying spirit, which deceives the world as the serpent beguiled Eve.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 365 of the original edition

6. We—The utterers of the true apostolic traditions from Christ himself, as claimed with bold emphasis by our St. John in 1 John 1:1-3. Hence here is the third test of the antichristic spirits—the not hearing the true gospel history and doctrine, as maintained and declared by St. John and his fellow-apostles. Compare similar claim of St. Paul, 1 Timothy 1:11-20, with our notes. As the apostles were the true chosen witnesses and pupils of Jesus, their narrative of facts and statements of principles are solely authoritative. The heretics were outsiders. They took their systems from the spirit of the age—the world—mixed them with Christian dogma, and undertook to palm an unhistorical, unauthentic, pseudo-Christianity upon the Church.

2. The one confirmatory test—love. The threefold love between God, the believer, and the brethren, 7-21.

The one test is love; centered in God, 8; and manifested to us in Christ, 9-11; into which love we come by union through faith with Christ and God, 12-16; which love may be perfected in us, 17-19; and this divine love is love to our fellow-man, 20, 21.

Our apostle does not argue and reason out this statement; he affirms it, aphoristically and positively, by successive assertions, as one who knows, having full original acquaintance with Christ himself. His words are dicta; the dicta of an authorized, original expounder, as being derived from the incarnate Original.

7

Beloved, let us love one another: for love is of God; and every one that loveth is born of God, and knoweth God.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 408 of the original edition

V. 7. Let us love one another-From the doctrine he has just been defending he draws this exhortation. It is by the Spirit that the love of God is shed abroad in our hearts.

Every one that truly loveth God and his neighbour is born of God.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 53 of the original edition

Verse 7. Beloved, let us love one another] And ever be ready to promote each other’s welfare, both spiritual and temporal.

For love is of God] And ever acts like him; he loves man, and daily loads him with his benefits. He that loveth most has most of God in him; and he that loveth God and his neighbour, as before described and commanded, is born of God, ek tou qeou gegennhtai, is begotten of God-is a true child of his heavenly Father, for he is made a partaker of the Divine nature; and this his love to God and man proves.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 853 of the original edition

Verses 7, 8. Let us love one another — From the doctrine he has just been defending, he draws this exhortation: as if he had said, Think it not enough speculatively to admit the Christian doctrine, but let it be your great care to acknowledge it practically, and especially with respect to that most important article, brotherly love. The frequency and earnestness with which the apostle, in the present epistle, inculcates this love, is very remarkable. The greatest part of this chapter, and of chapter 3., is employed in pressing this duty. See also 1 John 2:8-11. For love is of God — Is from him as its source, and particularly enjoined by him as a duty of the greatest importance, and of absolute necessity, in order to our pleasing and imitating him. And every one that loveth is born of God — Every one, in whose heart this divine principle reigns, and conquers the selfish and contrary passions, shows by it that he is regenerated and transformed into the divine image; and that he knoweth God — By the teaching of his Holy Spirit, as the God of love, infinitely amiable in himself, and infinitely loving to his people. On the other hand, he that loveth not, whatever he may pretend, knoweth not God — Has no experimental and saving knowledge of him; for God is love — Its great fountain and exemplar. He enjoins it by his law, and produces and cherishes it by the influences of his Spirit; and the due contemplation of him will naturally inflame our hearts with love to his divine majesty, and to our fellow-creatures for his sake, whose creatures they are, and especially to his children, who love him, bear his image, and are peculiarly dear to him. This little sentence, God is love, brought St. John more sweetness, even in the time he was writing it, says Bengelius, than the whole world can bring. God is often styled holy, righteous, wise; but not holiness, righteousness, or wisdom, in the abstract, as he is said to be love: intimating that this is his darling, his reigning attribute; the attribute that sheds an amiable glory on all his other perfections.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 366 of the original edition

7. Love one another—Namely, with that elevated love which desires and seeks to do everything for the happiness of the object loved, both temporal and eternal. Our apostle here begins with this spirit of love in our hearts, and traces it to its fountain, God. Knoweth God—Philosophers may prove by various arguments the being and attributes of God; but it is to divine experience we must resort to know God as love. Much of goodness appears in nature, but the fulness of love in God is learned by grace alone.

8

He that loveth not knoweth not God; for God is love.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 408 of the original edition

V. 8. God is love-This little sentence brought St. John more sweetness, even in the time he was writing it, than the whole world can bring. God is often styled holy, righteous, wise; but not holiness, righteousness, or wisdom in the abstract, as he is said to be love; intimating that this is his darling, his reigning attribute, the attribute that sheds an amiable glory on all his other perfections.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 54 of the original edition

Verse 8. He that loveth not] As already described, knoweth not God-has no experimental knowledge of him.

God is love.] An infinite fountain of benevolence and beneficence to every human being. He hates no thing that he has made. He cannot hate, because he is love. He causes his sun to rise on the evil and the good, and sends his rain on the just and the unjust. He has made no human being for perdition, nor ever rendered it impossible, by any necessitating decree, for any fallen soul to find mercy. He has given the fullest proof of his love to the whole human race by the incarnation of his Son, who tasted death for every man. How can a decree of absolute, unconditional reprobation, of the greater part or any part of the human race, stand in the presence of such a text as this? It has been well observed that, although God is holy, just, righteous, &c., he is never called holiness, justice, &c., in the abstract, as he is here called LOVE. This seems to be the essence of the Divine nature, and all other attributes to be only modifications of this.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 853 of the original edition

Verses 7, 8. Let us love one another — From the doctrine he has just been defending, he draws this exhortation: as if he had said, Think it not enough speculatively to admit the Christian doctrine, but let it be your great care to acknowledge it practically, and especially with respect to that most important article, brotherly love. The frequency and earnestness with which the apostle, in the present epistle, inculcates this love, is very remarkable. The greatest part of this chapter, and of chapter 3., is employed in pressing this duty. See also 1 John 2:8-11. For love is of God — Is from him as its source, and particularly enjoined by him as a duty of the greatest importance, and of absolute necessity, in order to our pleasing and imitating him. And every one that loveth is born of God — Every one, in whose heart this divine principle reigns, and conquers the selfish and contrary passions, shows by it that he is regenerated and transformed into the divine image; and that he knoweth God — By the teaching of his Holy Spirit, as the God of love, infinitely amiable in himself, and infinitely loving to his people. On the other hand, he that loveth not, whatever he may pretend, knoweth not God — Has no experimental and saving knowledge of him; for God is love — Its great fountain and exemplar. He enjoins it by his law, and produces and cherishes it by the influences of his Spirit; and the due contemplation of him will naturally inflame our hearts with love to his divine majesty, and to our fellow-creatures for his sake, whose creatures they are, and especially to his children, who love him, bear his image, and are peculiarly dear to him. This little sentence, God is love, brought St. John more sweetness, even in the time he was writing it, says Bengelius, than the whole world can bring. God is often styled holy, righteous, wise; but not holiness, righteousness, or wisdom, in the abstract, as he is said to be love: intimating that this is his darling, his reigning attribute; the attribute that sheds an amiable glory on all his other perfections.

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 383 of the original edition

Ver. 8. He that loveth not, knoweth not God, for God is love. If he knew God he could not but love his brother, for the knowledge of God would inspire him with that sentiment and feeling, and make him a happy partaker of the divine benevolence. Love would kindle his heart into a flame of pure desire, and of godlike charity towards all mankind.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 366 of the original edition

8. Loveth not, knoweth not God—It is the true heart that truly knoweth God. Without that blessed medium he is, after all, an “unknown God.” It is the pure in heart that “see God.” God is love—This blessed truth truly realized delivers from all atheism, all pessimism, all despondency at the evil in the world. When our hearts are right all is right.

9

In this was manifested the love of God toward us, because that God sent his only begotten Son into the world, that we might live through him.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 54 of the original edition

Verse 9. In this was manifested the love of God] The mission of Jesus Christ was the fullest proof that God could give, or that man could receive, of his infinite love to the world.

That we might live through him.] The whole world was sentenced to death because of sin; and every individual was dead in trespasses and sins; and Jesus came to die in the stead of the world, and to quicken every believer, that all might live to him who died for them and rose again. This is another strong allusion to John 3:16: God so loved the world, that he gave his only-begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life; where the reader is requested to see the note.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 854 of the original edition

Verse 9. In this was manifested the love of God — Namely, most eminently above all other instances thereof; because that God sent his only-begotten Son into the world — That is, evidently, sent him, who was his only-begotten Son before he was sent. “This,” as Macknight justly observes. “is an allusion to our Lord’s words, John 3:16, God so loved the world that he gave his only-begotten Son, &c. Christ is called God’s only-begotten Son, to distinguish him from all others, who in Scripture are called the sons of God; and to heighten our idea of God’s love to us, in giving a person of such dignity, and so beloved of God, to die for us. It is supposed, that by giving Christ the title of God’s only-begotten Son in this passage, the apostle intended to overturn the error of Ebion and Cerinthus, who affirmed that Christ was not God’s Son by nature, but that, like other good men, he was honoured with the title of God’s Son on account of his virtues; in which opinion these heresiarchs have been followed by some in modern times. They, however, who hold this opinion ought to show a reason why the epithet of the only begotten is appropriated to Christ.” That we might live through him — That the sentence of condemnation to the second death, to which we were obnoxious, might be reversed, and that being justified by living faith, and regenerated by the quickening Spirit of God, we might live a spiritual life in the divine favour, and in union with Christ here, and might be conducted to eternal life hereafter.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 366 of the original edition

9. In this was manifested—The kingdom of nature is full of destruction: it is in the kingdom of grace that God, as love, is manifested, and in the kingdom of glory is perfectly realized. The infinite and universal secret that God is love, rather than that God is power, obscured or concealed in physical nature, is embodied in Christ, revealed in his life and death, and proclaimed by his gospel. Sent his only Begotten Son—Not only proof of his love, but its incarnation and embodiment; revealing God’s character as love even in nature and in all things. Live—Be delivered from original non-existence, and enabled to live the life of eternal love.

10

Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that he loved us, and sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 54 of the original edition

Verse 10. Not that we loved God] And that he was thereby induced to give his Son to be a propitiation for our sins. No: we were enemies to God, and yet Christ died for our ungodly souls. (See Romans 5:6-11, and the notes there.) So it was God’s love, not our merit, that induced him to devise means that his banished might not be expelled from him.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 855 of the original edition

Verses 10-12. Herein is love — Worthy of our highest admiration; not that we loved God — First; for we were, on the contrary, in a state of enmity to him, in which, if we had remained unsolicited and untouched by his love and grace, we should have persisted and perished; but that he loved us — First, (verse 19,) without any merit or motive in us to induce him to do it; and, in his boundless compassion to our necessities and miseries; sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins — That is, to make atonement to his injured justice for them by offering himself as a sacrifice, and so to introduce us into his favour on honourable terms. If God so loved us — With such a transcendent, free, and inconceivable love; we ought also to love one another — In imitation of his divine example, from a sense of the happy state into which we are brought, and in gratitude to him for so inestimable a favour. And it is of the greater importance that we should do this, because it is absolutely necessary in order to our having fellowship with him. For no man hath seen God at any time — Nor indeed can see him, since he is in his own nature invisible; nor can any one have any knowledge of him, or intercourse with him by his senses, or any information concerning his will and the way of pleasing him by any visible appearance of him, or converse with him; yet, from what his only-begotten Son hath taught us, we know that if we love one another — In consequence of first loving him; God dwelleth menei, abideth, in us — This is treated of verses 13-16; and his love is perfected — Has its full effect; in us — This is treated of verses 17-19.

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 383 of the original edition

Ver. 10. Herein is love, the free and unmerited love of God to fallen man. The apostles are uniform in these declarations. Grace is grace. God so loved the world that he gave his only-begotten Son. Our songs are to him that hath loved us, and washed us from our sins in his own blood. Love was the sphere in which John moved, before he went to bathe his soul in the ocean of divine charity. He indeed could truly say, he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 367 of the original edition

10. Herein—In this that follows. Is love—Love essential and original, showing what real love is. We loved God—This was not original, but secondary and consequent; though for us an infinitely important consequence. He loved us—The propitiation was not needed from want of love for us in God the Father; in fact it sprang from, and was the expression of, his love. The wrath that needed to be propitiated was simply pure justice in its serenest, divinest form, which must be sustained as the basis of a moral realm. Propitiation—See notes on 1 John 2:1; Romans 3:25.

11

Beloved, if God so loved us, we ought also to love one another.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 55 of the original edition

Verse 11. If God so loved us] Without any reason or consideration on our part, and without any desert in us; we ought also, in like manner, to love one another, and not suspend our love to a fellow-creature, either on his moral worth or his love to us. We should love one another for God’s sake; and then, no unkind carriage of a brother would induce us to withdraw our love from him; for if it have GOD for its motive and model, it will never fail.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 855 of the original edition

Verses 10-12. Herein is love — Worthy of our highest admiration; not that we loved God — First; for we were, on the contrary, in a state of enmity to him, in which, if we had remained unsolicited and untouched by his love and grace, we should have persisted and perished; but that he loved us — First, (verse 19,) without any merit or motive in us to induce him to do it; and, in his boundless compassion to our necessities and miseries; sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins — That is, to make atonement to his injured justice for them by offering himself as a sacrifice, and so to introduce us into his favour on honourable terms. If God so loved us — With such a transcendent, free, and inconceivable love; we ought also to love one another — In imitation of his divine example, from a sense of the happy state into which we are brought, and in gratitude to him for so inestimable a favour. And it is of the greater importance that we should do this, because it is absolutely necessary in order to our having fellowship with him. For no man hath seen God at any time — Nor indeed can see him, since he is in his own nature invisible; nor can any one have any knowledge of him, or intercourse with him by his senses, or any information concerning his will and the way of pleasing him by any visible appearance of him, or converse with him; yet, from what his only-begotten Son hath taught us, we know that if we love one another — In consequence of first loving him; God dwelleth menei, abideth, in us — This is treated of verses 13-16; and his love is perfected — Has its full effect; in us — This is treated of verses 17-19.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 367 of the original edition

11. Love one another—The infinite consequence noted in our comment on last verse. God’s original love, poured forth through Christ, envelopes us all, and requires that we should all be ensphered in one common threefold love, with each other and with Christ and God.

12

No man hath seen God at any time. If we love one another, God dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 409 of the original edition

V. 12. If we love one another, God abideth in us-This is treated of, 1 John 4:13-16.

And his love is perfected-Has its full effect. In us-This is treated of, 1 John 4:17-19.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 55 of the original edition

Verse 12. No man hath seen God at any time.] The very words, with the change of ewrake for teqeatai, of this apostle in his gospel, John 1:18. We may feel him, though we cannot see him; and if we love one another he dwelleth in us, and his love is perfected in us-it has then its full accomplishment, having moulded us according to its own nature.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 855 of the original edition

Verses 10-12. Herein is love — Worthy of our highest admiration; not that we loved God — First; for we were, on the contrary, in a state of enmity to him, in which, if we had remained unsolicited and untouched by his love and grace, we should have persisted and perished; but that he loved us — First, (verse 19,) without any merit or motive in us to induce him to do it; and, in his boundless compassion to our necessities and miseries; sent his Son to be the propitiation for our sins — That is, to make atonement to his injured justice for them by offering himself as a sacrifice, and so to introduce us into his favour on honourable terms. If God so loved us — With such a transcendent, free, and inconceivable love; we ought also to love one another — In imitation of his divine example, from a sense of the happy state into which we are brought, and in gratitude to him for so inestimable a favour. And it is of the greater importance that we should do this, because it is absolutely necessary in order to our having fellowship with him. For no man hath seen God at any time — Nor indeed can see him, since he is in his own nature invisible; nor can any one have any knowledge of him, or intercourse with him by his senses, or any information concerning his will and the way of pleasing him by any visible appearance of him, or converse with him; yet, from what his only-begotten Son hath taught us, we know that if we love one another — In consequence of first loving him; God dwelleth menei, abideth, in us — This is treated of verses 13-16; and his love is perfected — Has its full effect; in us — This is treated of verses 17-19.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 367 of the original edition

12. No man hath seen God—Neither with bodily nor mental eye. And so we can know him as he is, love, only in the light of that circumfused love wherewith we love one another and him, to which we attain through the divine Propitiator, who has reconciled and unified us all in love, and through whom God has given us his Spirit, affirming him to be love. If we love one another with divine love, our incapacity to ocularly see God is remedied in this luminiferous ether of love.

13

Hereby know we that we dwell in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 55 of the original edition

Verse 13. Hereby know we, &c.] See Clarke’s note on “1 John 3:24”.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 855 of the original edition

Verses 13, 14. Hereby — En toutw, by this, we know — Have full proof; that we dwell, menomen, we abide in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit — In the enlightening, quickening, renewing, and comforting influences thereof. Some commentators understand the apostle as speaking here of the extraordinary gifts of the Spirit; but surely these gifts, of whatever kind they might be, never were to any man a certain evidence of his possessing real piety and union with God, as is manifest from our Lord’s words, (Matthew 7:22,) Many will say to me in that day of final judgment, We have prophesied in thy name, &c.; then will I profess unto them, I never knew you, &c. And St. Paul (1 Corinthians 13:2) declares, that though a man had such a measure of miracle-working faith, that he could remove mountains, yet if he had not love to God and mankind, it would profit him nothing. The ordinary graces of the Spirit, such as are enumerated Galatians 5:22, 23; Ephesians 5:9; Colossians 3:12-17; Romans 12:9-21, are certain evidences of a person’s being a child of God; but the extraordinary gifts of the Spirit are not, inasmuch as they sometimes have been and still may be possessed by persons destitute of true religion. And we have seen — Or known; by undoubted evidence, ourselves; and therefore do boldly testify to others; that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world — And that it is in and by him alone, how proudly soever the unbelieving and carnal world may reject and disdain him, that present and eternal salvation can be obtained. These things are the foundation and the criteria of our abiding in God and God in us, namely, the communion of the Spirit, spoken of verse 13, and the confession of the Son, verse 15.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 367 of the original edition

13. His Spirit—Which is itself at once love and light, warming us with itself, and showing itself to be of God.

14

And we have seen and do testify that the Father sent the Son to be the Savior of the world.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 409 of the original edition

V. 14. And in consequence of this we have seen and testify that the Father sent the Son-These are the foundation and the criteria of our abiding in God and God in us, the communion of the Spirit, and the confession of the Son.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 55 of the original edition

Verse 14. And we have seen] Jesus Christ manifested in the flesh; see 1 John 1:1, &c.; and do testify-bear witness, in consequence of having the fullest conviction, that the Father sent the son to be the Saviour of the world. We have had the fullest proof of this from his doctrine and miracles, which we heard and saw during the whole time that he sojourned among men.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 855 of the original edition

Verses 13, 14. Hereby — En toutw, by this, we know — Have full proof; that we dwell, menomen, we abide in him, and he in us, because he hath given us of his Spirit — In the enlightening, quickening, renewing, and comforting influences thereof. Some commentators understand the apostle as speaking here of the extraordinary gifts of the Spirit; but surely these gifts, of whatever kind they might be, never were to any man a certain evidence of his possessing real piety and union with God, as is manifest from our Lord’s words, (Matthew 7:22,) Many will say to me in that day of final judgment, We have prophesied in thy name, &c.; then will I profess unto them, I never knew you, &c. And St. Paul (1 Corinthians 13:2) declares, that though a man had such a measure of miracle-working faith, that he could remove mountains, yet if he had not love to God and mankind, it would profit him nothing. The ordinary graces of the Spirit, such as are enumerated Galatians 5:22, 23; Ephesians 5:9; Colossians 3:12-17; Romans 12:9-21, are certain evidences of a person’s being a child of God; but the extraordinary gifts of the Spirit are not, inasmuch as they sometimes have been and still may be possessed by persons destitute of true religion. And we have seen — Or known; by undoubted evidence, ourselves; and therefore do boldly testify to others; that the Father sent the Son to be the Saviour of the world — And that it is in and by him alone, how proudly soever the unbelieving and carnal world may reject and disdain him, that present and eternal salvation can be obtained. These things are the foundation and the criteria of our abiding in God and God in us, namely, the communion of the Spirit, spoken of verse 13, and the confession of the Son, verse 15.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 367 of the original edition

14. We have seen and do testify—This we is mainly the apostles. The coming of the Son as seen, bases the whole doctrine on historic grounds. Saviour of the world—This is his universal office. His atonement is universal, his salvation is universal, limited only in its effects by its being rejected by its proper subjects.

15

Whosoever shall confess that Jesus is the Son of God, God dwelleth in him, and he in God.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 409 of the original edition

V. 15. Whosoever shall, from a principle of loving faith, openly confess in the face of all opposition and danger, that Jesus is the Son of God, God abideth in him.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 55 of the original edition

Verse 15. Whosoever shall confess] Much stress is laid on this confession, because the false teachers denied the reality of the incarnation; but this confession implied also such a belief in Christ as put them in possession of his pardoning mercy and indwelling Spirit.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 856 of the original edition

Verses 15-17. Whosoever shall — From a principle of loving faith, openly confess — In the face of all opposition and danger, maintaining this profession with resolution and zeal, and acting in conformity to it; that Jesus is the Son of God — The Christ, the Saviour of the world; God abideth in him, and he in God — There is a blessed union between God and his soul, so that it is, in the language of Scripture, the habitation of God; who, as it were, lives and walks in him, Ephesians 2:22; 1 Corinthians 3:16; 2 Corinthians 6:18. And we have known and believed — By the influence of the same Spirit; the love that God hath to us — And hath manifested, not only by giving his Son to die for us, (verses 9, 10,) but by making us his children in and through his Son, 1 John 3:1. God is love — The apostle repeats what he had declared verse 8, where see the note; and he that abideth in love — Namely, in love to God, his people, and all mankind; abideth in God, and God in him — His union and communion with God are hereby continued and increased. Herein — Or hereby, that is, by the continuance of this communion with God; is our love made perfect — We are brought to love him with all our hearts, and our neighbour as ourselves; that we may have — That is, so that we shall have; boldness in the day of judgment — When all the stout-hearted shall tremble; because as he, Christ, is, so are we — Who are fathers in Christ; in this world — Even while we live on earth, so far as the imperfections of this mortal life, to which we are here confined, will admit.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 367 of the original edition

15. Confess—In accordance with our testify, in last verse. Jesus… Son of God—Not but that men may barely confess this one article and reject other truths, and thus be unsaved heretics. Our apostle simply gives this essential part for the whole testify; this being the test question between him and the heretics with whom he is dealing, Note 1 John 4:2.

16

And we have known and believed the love that God hath to us. God is love; and he that dwelleth in love dwelleth in God, and God in him.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 409 of the original edition

V. 16. And we know and believe-By the same Spirit, the love that God hath to us.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 55 of the original edition

Verse 16. God is love] See Clarke on “1 John 4:8”. He that dwelleth in love-he who is full of love to God and man is full of God, for God is love; and where such love is, there is God, for he is the fountain and maintainer of it.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 856 of the original edition

Verses 15-17. Whosoever shall — From a principle of loving faith, openly confess — In the face of all opposition and danger, maintaining this profession with resolution and zeal, and acting in conformity to it; that Jesus is the Son of God — The Christ, the Saviour of the world; God abideth in him, and he in God — There is a blessed union between God and his soul, so that it is, in the language of Scripture, the habitation of God; who, as it were, lives and walks in him, Ephesians 2:22; 1 Corinthians 3:16; 2 Corinthians 6:18. And we have known and believed — By the influence of the same Spirit; the love that God hath to us — And hath manifested, not only by giving his Son to die for us, (verses 9, 10,) but by making us his children in and through his Son, 1 John 3:1. God is love — The apostle repeats what he had declared verse 8, where see the note; and he that abideth in love — Namely, in love to God, his people, and all mankind; abideth in God, and God in him — His union and communion with God are hereby continued and increased. Herein — Or hereby, that is, by the continuance of this communion with God; is our love made perfect — We are brought to love him with all our hearts, and our neighbour as ourselves; that we may have — That is, so that we shall have; boldness in the day of judgment — When all the stout-hearted shall tremble; because as he, Christ, is, so are we — Who are fathers in Christ; in this world — Even while we live on earth, so far as the imperfections of this mortal life, to which we are here confined, will admit.

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 383 of the original edition

Ver. 16-18. God is love in all his works, in all his ways, and even the stroke of death is in unison with his lovingkindness in the gift of life. There is no fear in love, but perfect love casteth out fear. This is the love of confessors in the day of trial, when put to the bar of Roman tribunals. John admits here, that there are degrees of love. The pious archbishop Fenelon traces five degrees of this holy affection. — I translate his words almost verbatim.

“1. We may love God, not for himself, but for the good things he confers; gifts which depend on his pleasure, and which we hope to obtain. Such was the love of the carnal jews, who kept the law because he gave them harvests and rain.

2. There is also a mercenary love of God, when we regard him merely as the instrument of our happiness, and happiness which we can find in no other object. This may be regarded as loving ourselves, rather than God.

3. We may love God, if we may so call it, with a love of hope. This is mixed with a degree of loving God for himself, yet the motive is the reigning principle of self-love. And such is the love we feel in the commencement of our conversion.

4. There is a love of charity, which is mixed with some remains of self- love, but which nevertheless is the true regenerating love, because its predominating motive is disinterested. Sales says, Le souverain amour n’est qu’en la charite. Supreme love consists wholly in charity. This love can regenerate the heart, because it prefers God and his glory to our own interest.

5. We may love God with a love of pure charity, and without any mixture of the motives of self-love. When we love God in the midst of sufferings, and in such sort that we could not love him more, even when he loads the soul with divine consolations. In this love, neither the fear of chastisement, nor the desire of recompense, has any share. The purity of love consists in desiring nothing for ones-self; and in looking solely at the good pleasure of God.”

In short, true love to God consists in a supreme affection for his character, in a ravishing delight in his transcendent purity and benevolence, exclaiming with the prophet, How great is his goodness, and how great is his beauty! Zechariah 9:17. That which fills all heaven with ceaseless praise and adoration is the infinite and unapproachable purity of the divine nature. Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory! Isaiah 6:3. Revelation 4:8. A love like this, which is centred in God himself, is that alone which can meeten us for the society above, and to join in their adorations before the throne.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 368 of the original edition

16. Known—Not by direct, literal sight of God, (verse 12,) but by consciousness of his divine love, by which we feel that he is love.

17

Herein is our love made perfect, that we may have boldness in the day of judgment: because as he is, so are we in this world.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 409 of the original edition

V. 17. Hereby-That is, by this communion with God. Is our love made perfect; that we may-That is, so that we shall have boldness in the day of judgment-When all the stout-hearted shall tremble.

Because as he-Christ.

Is-All love.

So are we-Who are fathers in Christ, even in this world.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 55 of the original edition

Verse 17. Herein is our love made perfect] By God dwelling in us, and we in him; having cast out all the carnal mind that was enmity against himself, and filled the whole heart with the spirit of love and purity. Thus the love is made perfect; when it thus fills the heart it has all its degrees; it is all in all; and all in every power, passion, and faculty of the soul. May have boldness in the day of judgment] parrhsian. Freedom of speech, and liberty of access; seeing in the person of our Judge, him who has died for us, regenerated our hearts, and who himself fills them. As he is] Pure, holy, and loving; so are we in this world; being saved from our sins, and made like to himself in righteousness and true holiness. No man can contemplate the day of judgment with any comfort or satisfaction but on this ground, that the blood of Christ hath cleansed him from all sin, and that he is kept by the power of God, through faith, unto salvation. This will give him boldness in the day of judgment.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 856 of the original edition

Verses 15-17. Whosoever shall — From a principle of loving faith, openly confess — In the face of all opposition and danger, maintaining this profession with resolution and zeal, and acting in conformity to it; that Jesus is the Son of God — The Christ, the Saviour of the world; God abideth in him, and he in God — There is a blessed union between God and his soul, so that it is, in the language of Scripture, the habitation of God; who, as it were, lives and walks in him, Ephesians 2:22; 1 Corinthians 3:16; 2 Corinthians 6:18. And we have known and believed — By the influence of the same Spirit; the love that God hath to us — And hath manifested, not only by giving his Son to die for us, (verses 9, 10,) but by making us his children in and through his Son, 1 John 3:1. God is love — The apostle repeats what he had declared verse 8, where see the note; and he that abideth in love — Namely, in love to God, his people, and all mankind; abideth in God, and God in him — His union and communion with God are hereby continued and increased. Herein — Or hereby, that is, by the continuance of this communion with God; is our love made perfect — We are brought to love him with all our hearts, and our neighbour as ourselves; that we may have — That is, so that we shall have; boldness in the day of judgment — When all the stout-hearted shall tremble; because as he, Christ, is, so are we — Who are fathers in Christ; in this world — Even while we live on earth, so far as the imperfections of this mortal life, to which we are here confined, will admit.

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 383 of the original edition

Ver. 16-18. God is love in all his works, in all his ways, and even the stroke of death is in unison with his lovingkindness in the gift of life. There is no fear in love, but perfect love casteth out fear. This is the love of confessors in the day of trial, when put to the bar of Roman tribunals. John admits here, that there are degrees of love. The pious archbishop Fenelon traces five degrees of this holy affection. — I translate his words almost verbatim.

“1. We may love God, not for himself, but for the good things he confers; gifts which depend on his pleasure, and which we hope to obtain. Such was the love of the carnal jews, who kept the law because he gave them harvests and rain.

2. There is also a mercenary love of God, when we regard him merely as the instrument of our happiness, and happiness which we can find in no other object. This may be regarded as loving ourselves, rather than God.

3. We may love God, if we may so call it, with a love of hope. This is mixed with a degree of loving God for himself, yet the motive is the reigning principle of self-love. And such is the love we feel in the commencement of our conversion.

4. There is a love of charity, which is mixed with some remains of self- love, but which nevertheless is the true regenerating love, because its predominating motive is disinterested. Sales says, Le souverain amour n’est qu’en la charite. Supreme love consists wholly in charity. This love can regenerate the heart, because it prefers God and his glory to our own interest.

5. We may love God with a love of pure charity, and without any mixture of the motives of self-love. When we love God in the midst of sufferings, and in such sort that we could not love him more, even when he loads the soul with divine consolations. In this love, neither the fear of chastisement, nor the desire of recompense, has any share. The purity of love consists in desiring nothing for ones-self; and in looking solely at the good pleasure of God.”

In short, true love to God consists in a supreme affection for his character, in a ravishing delight in his transcendent purity and benevolence, exclaiming with the prophet, How great is his goodness, and how great is his beauty! Zechariah 9:17. That which fills all heaven with ceaseless praise and adoration is the infinite and unapproachable purity of the divine nature. Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory! Isaiah 6:3. Revelation 4:8. A love like this, which is centred in God himself, is that alone which can meeten us for the society above, and to join in their adorations before the throne.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 368 of the original edition

17. Love… perfect—It is carried to its proper completion. Boldness— Fearlessness. A calm assurance that our judge is our friend, and that for us there is no condemnation. And this boldness is not based on the idea that there is no punishment for the finally impenitent, but upon the consciousness, through the spirit of love bestowed upon us, that our reconciliation with him is perfect. Day of judgment. His parousia, or coming. See notes on 1 John 2:28; 2 Thessalonians 2:2, 8. As he is, so are we—Our moral conformity in love gives us a trusting sympathy. He is the holy Son of God, we, his reconciled children. In this world— Equally opposed to us both.

18

There is no fear in love; but perfect love casteth out fear: because fear hath torment. He that feareth is not made perfect in love.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 409 of the original edition

V. 18. There is no fear in love-No slavish fear can be where love reigns. But perfect, adult love casteth out slavish fear: because such fear hath torment-And so is inconsistent with the happiness of love. A natural man has neither fear nor love; one that is awakened, fear without love; a babe in Christ, love and fear; a father in Christ, love without fear.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 56 of the original edition

Verse 18. There is no fear in love] The man who feels that he loves God with all his heart can never dread him as his Judge. As he is now made a partaker of his Spirit, and carries a sense of the Divine approbation in his conscience, he has nothing of that fear that produces terror or brings torment. The perfect love-that fulness of love, which he has received, casteth out fear-removes all terror relative to this day of judgment, for it is of this that the apostle particularly speaks. And as it is inconsistent with the gracious design of God to have his followers miserable, and as he cannot be unhappy whose heart is full of the love of his God, this love must necessarily exclude this fear or terror; because that brings torment, and hence is inconsistent with that happiness which a man must have who continually enjoys the approbation of his God.

He that feareth] He who is still uncertain concerning his interest in Christ; who, although he has many heavenly drawings, and often sits with Christ some moments on a throne of love, yet feels from the evils of his heart a dread of the day of judgment; is not made perfect in love-has not yet received the abiding witness of the Spirit that he is begotten of God; nor that fulness of love to God and man which excludes the enmity of the carnal mind, and which it is his privilege to receive. But is the case of such a man desperate? No: it is neither desperate nor deplorable; he is in the way of salvation, and not far from the kingdom of heaven. Let such earnestly seek, and fervently believe on the Son of God; and he will soon give them another baptism of his Spirit, will purge out all the old leaven, and fill their whole souls with that love which is the fulfilling of the law. He who is not yet perfect in love may speedily become so, because God can say in a moment, I will, be thou clean; and immediately his leprosy will depart. Among men we find some that have neither love nor fear; others that have fear without love; others that have love and fear; and others that have love without fear.

1. Profligates, and worldly men in general, have neither the fear nor love of God.

2. Deeply awakened and distressed penitents have the fear or terror of God without his love.

3. Babes in Christ, or young converts, have often distressing fear mixed with their love.

4. Adult Christians have love without this fear; because fear hath torment, and they are ever happy, being filled with God. See Mr. Wesley’s note on this place.

1. We must not suppose that the love of God shed abroad in the heart is ever imperfect in itself; it is only so in degree. There may be a less or greater degree of what is perfect in itself; so it is with respect to the love which the followers of God have; they may have measures or degrees of perfect love without its fulness. There is nothing imperfect in the love of God, whether it be considered as existing in himself, or as communicated to his followers.

2. We are not to suppose that the love of God casts out every kind of fear from the soul; it only casts out that which has torment. 1. A filial fear is consistent with the highest degrees of love; and even necessary to the preservation of that grace. This is properly its guardian; and, without this, love would soon degenerate into listlessness, or presumptive boldness. 2. Nor does it cast out that fear which is so necessary to the preservation of life; that fear which leads a man to flee from danger lest his life should be destroyed. 3. Nor does it cast out that fear which may be engendered by sudden alarm. All these are necessary to our well-being. But it destroys, 1. The fear of want; 2. The fear of death; and 3. The fear or terror of judgment. All these fears bring torment, and are inconsistent with this perfect love.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 856 of the original edition

Verses 18, 19. There is no fear in love — No slavish or tormenting fear, diffidence, or distrust, can be where love reigns; but perfect, mature love casteth out such fear, because such fear hath torment — And so is inconsistent with the happiness of love. He that feareth is not made perfect in love — In the sense above explained. Study therefore to increase more and more in that noble affection of love to God, and you will find your happiness increasing in proportion to it. Observe, reader, a mere natural man has neither the fear nor love of God; one that is awakened and convinced of sin, has fear without love; a babe in Christ, love and fear; a father in Christ, love without fear. We love him, because he first loved us — This is the sum of all religion, the genuine model of Christianity. None can say more; why should any one say less, or speak less intelligibly?

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 383 of the original edition

Ver. 16-18. God is love in all his works, in all his ways, and even the stroke of death is in unison with his lovingkindness in the gift of life. There is no fear in love, but perfect love casteth out fear. This is the love of confessors in the day of trial, when put to the bar of Roman tribunals. John admits here, that there are degrees of love. The pious archbishop Fenelon traces five degrees of this holy affection. — I translate his words almost verbatim.

“1. We may love God, not for himself, but for the good things he confers; gifts which depend on his pleasure, and which we hope to obtain. Such was the love of the carnal jews, who kept the law because he gave them harvests and rain.

2. There is also a mercenary love of God, when we regard him merely as the instrument of our happiness, and happiness which we can find in no other object. This may be regarded as loving ourselves, rather than God.

3. We may love God, if we may so call it, with a love of hope. This is mixed with a degree of loving God for himself, yet the motive is the reigning principle of self-love. And such is the love we feel in the commencement of our conversion.

4. There is a love of charity, which is mixed with some remains of self- love, but which nevertheless is the true regenerating love, because its predominating motive is disinterested. Sales says, Le souverain amour n’est qu’en la charite. Supreme love consists wholly in charity. This love can regenerate the heart, because it prefers God and his glory to our own interest.

5. We may love God with a love of pure charity, and without any mixture of the motives of self-love. When we love God in the midst of sufferings, and in such sort that we could not love him more, even when he loads the soul with divine consolations. In this love, neither the fear of chastisement, nor the desire of recompense, has any share. The purity of love consists in desiring nothing for ones-self; and in looking solely at the good pleasure of God.”

In short, true love to God consists in a supreme affection for his character, in a ravishing delight in his transcendent purity and benevolence, exclaiming with the prophet, How great is his goodness, and how great is his beauty! Zechariah 9:17. That which fills all heaven with ceaseless praise and adoration is the infinite and unapproachable purity of the divine nature. Holy, holy, holy, is the Lord of hosts: the whole earth is full of his glory! Isaiah 6:3. Revelation 4:8. A love like this, which is centred in God himself, is that alone which can meeten us for the society above, and to join in their adorations before the throne.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 368 of the original edition

18. No fear in love—They are contrary affections. So far as love is perfected so far is fear dispersed. So Bengel strikingly gives the grades of our moral state: “Without fear or love; with fear, but without love: with both love and fear; with love without fear.” Casteth out—The stronger and better affection expels the weaker and the worse. Fear hath torment—And this shows that the exclusion of the apostle’s fear is not the exclusion of that reverential fear which “is the beginning of wisdom.” Torment—Sense of guilt and dread of penalty. Feareth—The dread of penalty arising from conscious guilt shows us to be not perfect in love. We have here, then, something of a subjective measure of what is sometimes called “Christian perfection.” When there exists within our hearts the consciousness of the full divine acceptance, so complete that we have no fear at the thought of meeting him at judgment, we may trust that our love is perfected. The maintenance of this consciousness, sustained and justified by the external life, is the highest aim of life.

19

We love him, because he first loved us.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 410 of the original edition

V. 19. We love him, because he first loved us-This is the sum of all religion, the genuine model of Christianity. None can say more: why should any one say less, or less intelligibly?

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 57 of the original edition

Verse 19. We love him because he first loved us.] This is the foundation of our love to God. 1. We love him because we find he has loved us. 2. We love him from a sense of obligation and gratitude. 3. We love him from the influence of his own love; from his love shed abroad in our hearts, our love to him proceeds. It is the seed whence our love springs. The verse might be rendered, Let us therefore love him, because he first loved us: thus the Syriac and Vulgate.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 856 of the original edition

Verses 18, 19. There is no fear in love — No slavish or tormenting fear, diffidence, or distrust, can be where love reigns; but perfect, mature love casteth out such fear, because such fear hath torment — And so is inconsistent with the happiness of love. He that feareth is not made perfect in love — In the sense above explained. Study therefore to increase more and more in that noble affection of love to God, and you will find your happiness increasing in proportion to it. Observe, reader, a mere natural man has neither the fear nor love of God; one that is awakened and convinced of sin, has fear without love; a babe in Christ, love and fear; a father in Christ, love without fear. We love him, because he first loved us — This is the sum of all religion, the genuine model of Christianity. None can say more; why should any one say less, or speak less intelligibly?

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 385 of the original edition

Ver. 19. We love him, because he first loved us. His love, as in ver. 12, being “perfected in us,” constrains us to love him in return. There is an entire harmony between the regenerate heart and the law of love. “Draw me, and I will run after thee.” Grace reigns in the hearts of all those who are thus sanctified, and made perfect in love. He loves us in all the work of redemption, in all the alarms of conscience, and the terrors of a fiery law. He loves us by opening his arms to receive sinners, and by unfolding wide the gates of glory to call us home.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 368 of the original edition

19. He first loved us—And thus our firm and fearless love has a firm and assuring base, his antecedent love. God as love is source of all divine love in man. That preceding love demands our responsive love, and becomes its assurance.

20

If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother, he is a liar: for he that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen?

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 410 of the original edition

V. 20. Whom he hath seen-Who is daily presented to his senses, to raise his esteem, and move his kindness or compassion toward him.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 58 of the original edition

Verse 20. If a man say, I love God, and hateth his brother] This, as well as many other parts of this epistle, seems levelled against the Jews, who pretended much love to God while they hated the Gentiles; and even some of them who were brought into the Christian Church brought this leaven with them. It required a miracle to redeem St. Peter’s mind from the influence of this principle. See Acts 10.

Whom he hath seen] We may have our love excited towards our brother,

1. By a consideration of his excellences or amiable qualities. 2. By a view of his miseries and distresses. The first will excite a love of complacency and delight; the second, a love of compassion and pity.

Whom he hath not seen?] If he love not his brother, it is a proof that the love of God is not in him; and if he have not the love of God, he cannot love God, for God can be loved only through the influence of his own love. See Clarke on “1 John 4:19”. The man who hates his fellow does not love God. He who does not love God has not the love of God in him, and he who has not the love of God in him can neither love God nor man.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 857 of the original edition

Verses 20, 21. If any man say, I love God — And even say it with the utmost confidence; and hateth his brother — Which he will do more or less, if he do not love him; he is a liar — He affirms what is false, although, perhaps, he may not know it to be so; for he that loveth not his brother, whom he hath seen — Who is daily presented to his senses to raise his esteem, or move his kindness or compassion toward him; how can he love God, whom he hath not seen? — Whose excellences are not the objects of his senses, but are discovered imperfectly from his works of creation, providence, and grace, or from the declarations and promises of his word; his invisible nature being an obstacle to our loving him, which our weak and carnal minds cannot be expected easily to conquer. Indeed, we never could love him unless, as the apostle observes, his love were shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost given to us. And this commandment have we from him — Both from God and Christ; that he who loveth God, love his brother in Christ also — That is, every one, whatever his opinions or modes of worship may be, purely because he is the child and bears the image of God. Bigotry is properly the want of this pure and universal love. A bigot only loves those who embrace his opinions, and he loves them for that, not for Christ’s sake.

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 385 of the original edition

Ver. 20, 21. He that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen? Our poor brother was made in the image of God, is the special object of redeeming love, and is praying, working, and warring with us in the same pilgrimage. He shall by and bye be with Christ in his kingdom, and probably higher in glory than we. Let us then love him as a brother beloved of the Lord.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 368 of the original edition

20. And this love is circumfused around us, encompassing our brother. Hath seen… hath not seen—We can love those we have not seen—our invisible benefactors. The Americans love Washington. But it is a higher effort, depending on faith and not sight, to love a person of past history. But as said on verse 12, we know the unseen God as love only through the blessed atmosphere of love encompassing our seen brethren with ourselves. Without love to the seen, he is a liar who claims to love the unseen God.

21

And this commandment have we from him, That he who loveth God love his brother also.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 410 of the original edition

V. 21. And this commandment have we from him-Both God and Christ. That he who loveth God love his brother-Every one, whatever his opinions or mode of worship be, purely because he is the child, and bears the image, of God. Bigotry is properly the want of this pure and universal love. A bigot only loves those who embrace his opinions, and receive his way of worship; and he loves them for that, and not for Christ's sake.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 58 of the original edition

Verse 21. This commandment have we] We should love one another, and love our neighbour as ourselves. The love of God and the love of man can never be separated; he who loves God will love his brother; he who loves his brother gives this proof that he loves God, because he loves with a measure of that love which, in its infinitude, dwells in God. I JOHN

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 857 of the original edition

Verses 20, 21. If any man say, I love God — And even say it with the utmost confidence; and hateth his brother — Which he will do more or less, if he do not love him; he is a liar — He affirms what is false, although, perhaps, he may not know it to be so; for he that loveth not his brother, whom he hath seen — Who is daily presented to his senses to raise his esteem, or move his kindness or compassion toward him; how can he love God, whom he hath not seen? — Whose excellences are not the objects of his senses, but are discovered imperfectly from his works of creation, providence, and grace, or from the declarations and promises of his word; his invisible nature being an obstacle to our loving him, which our weak and carnal minds cannot be expected easily to conquer. Indeed, we never could love him unless, as the apostle observes, his love were shed abroad in our hearts by the Holy Ghost given to us. And this commandment have we from him — Both from God and Christ; that he who loveth God, love his brother in Christ also — That is, every one, whatever his opinions or modes of worship may be, purely because he is the child and bears the image of God. Bigotry is properly the want of this pure and universal love. A bigot only loves those who embrace his opinions, and he loves them for that, not for Christ’s sake.

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 385 of the original edition

Ver. 20, 21. He that loveth not his brother whom he hath seen, how can he love God whom he hath not seen? Our poor brother was made in the image of God, is the special object of redeeming love, and is praying, working, and warring with us in the same pilgrimage. He shall by and bye be with Christ in his kingdom, and probably higher in glory than we. Let us then love him as a brother beloved of the Lord.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 369 of the original edition

21. And this whole doctrine of love takes the form of a commandment. Not only we may, but we must. It is a divine invariable law, that the lover of God be a lover of his brother. Our highest blessedness is our highest duty.