Wesleyan Heritage Library Search /

1 Samuel · Chapter 23

29 verses
1

Then they told David, saying, Behold, the Philistines fight against Keilah, and they rob the threshingfloors.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 68 of the original edition

V. 1. The Philistines, &c.-Probably it was the departure of God and David from Saul, that encouraged the Philistines to make this inroad. When princes begin to persecute God’s people and ministers, let them expect nothing but vexation on all sides.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 138 of the original edition

Verse 1. The Philistines fight against Keilah] Keilah was a fortified town in the tribe of Judah near to Eleutheropolis, on the road to Hebron. Rob the threshing-floors.] This was an ancient custom of the Philistines, Midianites, and others. See Judges 6:4. When the corn was ripe and fit to be threshed, and they had collected it at the threshing-floors, which were always in the open field, then their enemies came upon them and spoiled them of the fruits of their harvest.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 261 of the original edition

Verse 1. Then they told — Or rather, Now they had told David. For it is evident from verse 6, that David had received the information here referred to, and had even delivered the inhabitants of Keilah before Abiathar came to tell him of the slaughter of the priests. The Philistines fight against Keilah — Probably the Philistines were encouraged to make this inroad into the land of Israel by hearing that David was forced to flee his country, and that God had departed from Saul. When princes begin to persecute God’s people and ministers, let them expect nothing but vexation on all sides. Keilah was a city in the tribe of Judah, Joshua 15:44. They rob the thrashing-floors — Which were commonly without their cities, for the convenience of wind, to separate the chaff from the corn. See Ruth 3:2.

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 749 of the original edition

Verse 1. Keilah, a walled town in the south of Judah, near the sources of the brook Besor.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID AT KEILAH, 1-13.

1. Keilah — The modern Kila, situated about four miles northwest of Hebron on a projecting cliff on the right bank of Wady el-Feranj. See on Joshua 15:44. It was a fortified place defended by gates and bars. Verse

7. Threshing floors — See on Judges 6:11, and Ruth 3:2.

2

Therefore David enquired of the LORD, saying, Shall I go and smite these Philistines? And the LORD said unto David, Go, and smite the Philistines, and save Keilah.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 138 of the original edition

Verse 2. Therefore David inquired of the Lord] In what way David made this inquiry we are not told, but it was probably by means of Abiathar; and therefore I think, with Houbigant that the sixth verse should be read immediately after the first. The adventure mentioned here was truly noble. Had not David loved his country, and been above all motives of private and personal revenge, he would have rejoiced in this invasion of Judah as producing a strong diversion in his favour, and embroiling his inveterate enemy. In most cases a man with David’s wrongs would have joined with the enemies of his country, and avenged himself on the author of his adversities; but he thinks of nothing but succouring Keilah, and using his power and influence in behalf of his brethren! This is a rare instance of disinterested heroism.

The Lord said-Go and smite] He might now go with confidence, being assured of success. When God promises success, who need be afraid of the face of any enemy?

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 261 of the original edition

Verse 2. David inquired of the Lord — In what way he made inquiry is not certain, as it seems from verse 6 that Abiathar had not yet brought to David the sacred ephod, with all things belonging to it that were made use of in consulting God. Shall I go and smite these Philistines? — We have here a remarkable instance of David’s love to his country; unto which he did not become an enemy when he was banished from it. On the contrary, he hasted to its assistance unsolicited. This action of David’s, in going to the relief of Keilah, is one of the most extraordinary ones recorded in history. “Another man, in David’s place, would have rejoiced at this invasion, and perhaps encouraged it; and this both from self-preservation and policy; first, because he had nothing to fear for himself, while Saul had such an enemy upon his hands; and secondly, because the distress of his country was the likeliest means to bring Saul to reason, and force him to recall, and be reconciled to, his best champion. But David was governed by other than these narrow views; nor safety nor honour was desirable to him, purchased by the distress of his country and his friends. His bosom beat with an eager desire to relieve Keilah; but it was not an adventure to be unadvisedly undertaken; and therefore he inquired of God, saying, Shall I go and smite these Philistines? This is one of those passages of Scripture that give evidence of their own truth. None but a hero could put the question; and none but God could resolve it: And the Lord said unto David. Go, and smite the Philistines, and save Keilah.” — Delaney.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

2. David inquired of the Lord — Through the urim and thummin of the priest Abiathar.

3

And David’s men said unto him, Behold, we be afraid here in Judah: how much more then if we come to Keilah against the armies of the Philistines?

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 262 of the original edition

Verses 3, 4. David’s men said, Behold, we are afraid here in Judah — “They had more than difficulty enough to defend themselves against Saul where they were; and could it be less than madness to provoke more and greater enemies? Doubtless Saul would send forces to beat off the Philistines, and then they should be pent in between two hostile armies. And yet, notwithstanding all this, David undertook and achieved the adventure; which it was impossible he should, against such fears, and such reasonings of his forces, from any motive other than the assurance of divine protection and aid. Which fully confirms the Scripture account of this matter, that he did not undertake it until he had, for the fuller satisfaction of his associates, again consulted, and was again assured of success by the divine oracle.”

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

3. We be afraid here in Judah — Afraid of Saul’s pursuit and sudden attack. They thought that any engagement against an enemy would expose them to still greater danger.

4

Then David enquired of the LORD yet again. And the LORD answered him and said, Arise, go down to Keilah; for I will deliver the Philistines into thine hand.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 68 of the original edition

V. 4. Enquired again-Not for his own, but for his soldiers satisfaction.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 139 of the original edition

Verse 4. David inquired of the Lord yet again] This was to satisfy his men, who made the strong objections mentioned in the preceding verse.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 262 of the original edition

Verses 3, 4. David’s men said, Behold, we are afraid here in Judah — “They had more than difficulty enough to defend themselves against Saul where they were; and could it be less than madness to provoke more and greater enemies? Doubtless Saul would send forces to beat off the Philistines, and then they should be pent in between two hostile armies. And yet, notwithstanding all this, David undertook and achieved the adventure; which it was impossible he should, against such fears, and such reasonings of his forces, from any motive other than the assurance of divine protection and aid. Which fully confirms the Scripture account of this matter, that he did not undertake it until he had, for the fuller satisfaction of his associates, again consulted, and was again assured of success by the divine oracle.”

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 749 of the original edition

Ver. 4. David enquired of the Lord yet again. Gideon also asked a double sign in time of fear and doubt, by the falling of dew on the fleece.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID AT KEILAH, 1-13.

1. Keilah — The modern Kila, situated about four miles northwest of Hebron on a projecting cliff on the right bank of Wady el-Feranj. See on Joshua 15:44. It was a fortified place defended by gates and bars. Verse

7. Threshing floors — See on Judges 6:11, and Ruth 3:2.

5

So David and his men went to Keilah, and fought with the Philistines, and brought away their cattle, and smote them with a great slaughter. So David saved the inhabitants of Keilah.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 139 of the original edition

Verse 5. Brought away their cattle] The forage and spoil which the Philistines had taken, driving the country before them round about Keilah.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 262 of the original edition

Verse 5. So David and his men went to Keilah, &c. — “His success on this occasion was very extraordinary; he saved the city and the inhabitants; he delivered the country all around from the ravages of the enemy; he smote the Philistines with great slaughter, and brought away their cattle, by which means he was enabled to subsist himself and his forces, without being a burden to his country. One would have imagined that this extraordinary success and deliverance of so great a city might have secured David a safe retreat among the men of Keilah; but it was not so; such is the nature of man, present dangers quickly obliterate past obligations! Gratitude is, without question, a most lovely virtue, but seldom lives in the extremes either of adversity or success! It is like those fine colours which storms and sunshine equally deface.” — Delaney.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID AT KEILAH, 1-13.

1. Keilah — The modern Kila, situated about four miles northwest of Hebron on a projecting cliff on the right bank of Wady el-Feranj. See on Joshua 15:44. It was a fortified place defended by gates and bars. Verse

7. Threshing floors — See on Judges 6:11, and Ruth 3:2.

6

And it came to pass, when Abiathar the son of Ahimelech fled to David to Keilah, that he came down with an ephod in his hand.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 68 of the original edition

V. 6. Ephod-With the Ephod, the high-priest’s Ephod, wherein were the Urim and the Thummim, which when Ahimelech and the rest of the priests went to Saul, were probably left in his hand. This gave him the opportunity both of escaping, whilst Doeg the butcher was killing his brethren, and of bringing away the Ephod, which Saul now was justly deprived of.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 139 of the original edition

Verse 6. Came down with an ephod.] I think this verse should come immediately after 1 Samuel 23:1. See Clarke’s note there, “1 Samuel 23:1”.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 262 of the original edition

Verse 6. He came down with an ephod — Rather, with the ephod, namely, the high-priest’s ephod, wherein were the Urim and Thummim. For Abiathar, being left, it is probable, to keep the sanctuary, while his father Ahimelech and the rest of the priests went to wait upon Saul, as soon as he heard of their slaughter he took this principal vestment of the high-priest, and carried it to David. Thus God, in the course of his providence, gave him an opportunity, while Doeg, the butcher, was killing his brethren, both of escaping himself and of bringing to David the ephod, of which now Saul was justly deprived.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

6. When Abiathar… fled to David to Keilah — This does not refer to the time when Abiathar first fled to David from Nob, but to a subsequent flight from the wilderness of Judah to Keilah, after David and his men had taken possession of that city. This verse is not out of its proper place, as Houbigant supposes, but is inserted here to prepare the reader for what immediately follows. When David went forth to defend the inhabitants of Keilah, Abiathar remained in the wilderness until he heard that Saul was making preparations to besiege David and his men at Keilah; then he hastened down thither with the ephod in his hand. By means of this ephod David received communications from Jehovah which enabled him to make a timely escape from Keilah.

7

And it was told Saul that David was come to Keilah. And Saul said, God hath delivered him into mine hand; for he is shut in, by entering into a town that hath gates and bars.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 263 of the original edition

Verse 7. Saul said, God hath delivered him into my hand — David, who judged of other men’s generosity by his own, hoped he should be protected in Keilah; and Saul, who judged in the same manner of their baseness, believed he should not; and therefore he rejoiced upon receiving the news of David’s being shut up there, persuaded he should now get possession of his person. But it was strange he should imagine that God had taken measures to bring an innocent and pious man into his power, who was a contemner of God, a breaker of his commandments, and one that trampled on all laws, human and divine.

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 749 of the original edition

Ver. 7. Saul said, God hath delivered him into my hand. Saul here consulted with his own heart, while David enquired of the Lord.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID AT KEILAH, 1-13.

1. Keilah — The modern Kila, situated about four miles northwest of Hebron on a projecting cliff on the right bank of Wady el-Feranj. See on Joshua 15:44. It was a fortified place defended by gates and bars. Verse

7. Threshing floors — See on Judges 6:11, and Ruth 3:2.

8

And Saul called all the people together to war, to go down to Keilah, to besiege David and his men.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 139 of the original edition

Verse 8. Saul called all the people together] That is, all the people of that region or district, that they might scour the country, and hunt out David from all his haunts.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID AT KEILAH, 1-13.

1. Keilah — The modern Kila, situated about four miles northwest of Hebron on a projecting cliff on the right bank of Wady el-Feranj. See on Joshua 15:44. It was a fortified place defended by gates and bars. Verse

7. Threshing floors — See on Judges 6:11, and Ruth 3:2.

9

And David knew that Saul secretly practiced mischief against him; and he said to Abiathar the priest, Bring hither the ephod.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 139 of the original edition

Verse 9. Bring hither the ephod.] It seems as if David himself, clothed with the ephod, had consulted the Lord; and 1 Samuel 23:10-12 contain the words of the consultation, and the Lord’s answer. But see on 1 Samuel 23:2.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 263 of the original edition

Verses 9-11. Bring hither the ephod — Which, doubtless, Abiathar put on; otherwise he could not have inquired of the Lord by it. The Lord said, He will come down — He purposeth to come if thou continue here. For still both David’s question and God’s answer are conditional, upon supposition. As David’s being there was the only motive for Saul’s coming, so, if he departed, Saul could have no inducement to come. And accordingly we find he laid aside his design so soon as he was informed that David had escaped. It seems probable from this place that God’s answer by Urim and Thummim was not by any change in the colour or situation of the precious stones in the breast-plate of the ephod, but by a voice or suggestion from God to the high-priest.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID AT KEILAH, 1-13.

1. Keilah — The modern Kila, situated about four miles northwest of Hebron on a projecting cliff on the right bank of Wady el-Feranj. See on Joshua 15:44. It was a fortified place defended by gates and bars. Verse

7. Threshing floors — See on Judges 6:11, and Ruth 3:2.

10

Then said David, O LORD God of Israel, thy servant hath certainly heard that Saul seeketh to come to Keilah, to destroy the city for my sake.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 263 of the original edition

Verses 9-11. Bring hither the ephod — Which, doubtless, Abiathar put on; otherwise he could not have inquired of the Lord by it. The Lord said, He will come down — He purposeth to come if thou continue here. For still both David’s question and God’s answer are conditional, upon supposition. As David’s being there was the only motive for Saul’s coming, so, if he departed, Saul could have no inducement to come. And accordingly we find he laid aside his design so soon as he was informed that David had escaped. It seems probable from this place that God’s answer by Urim and Thummim was not by any change in the colour or situation of the precious stones in the breast-plate of the ephod, but by a voice or suggestion from God to the high-priest.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID AT KEILAH, 1-13.

1. Keilah — The modern Kila, situated about four miles northwest of Hebron on a projecting cliff on the right bank of Wady el-Feranj. See on Joshua 15:44. It was a fortified place defended by gates and bars. Verse

7. Threshing floors — See on Judges 6:11, and Ruth 3:2.

11

Will the men of Keilah deliver me up into his hand? will Saul come down, as thy servant hath heard? O LORD God of Israel, I beseech thee, tell thy servant. And the LORD said, He will come down.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 68 of the original edition

V. 11. The Lord said-From this place it may appear that God’s answer by Urim and Thummim, was not by any change in the colour or situation of the precious stones in the breast-plate of the Ephod, but by a voice or suggestion from God to the high-priest. He will-He purposeth to come, if thou continuest here. For still as David’s question, so God’s answer, is upon supposition.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 139 of the original edition

Verses 11. - 12. In these verses we find the following questions and answers:-David said, Will Saul come down to Keilah? And the Lord said, He will come down. Will the men of Keilah deliver me and my men into the hand of Saul? And the Lord said, They will deliver thee up. In this short history we find an ample proof that there is such a thing as contingency in human affairs; that is, God has poised many things between a possibility of being and not being, leaving it to the will of the creature to turn the scale. In the above answers of the Lord the following conditions were evidently implied:-IF thou continue in Keilah, Saul will certainly come down; and IF Saul come down, the men of Keilah will deliver thee into his hands. Now though the text positively asserts that Saul would come to Keilah, yet he did not come; and that the men of Keilah would deliver David into his hand, yet David was not thus delivered to him. And why? Because David left Keilah; but had he stayed, Saul would have come down, and the men of Keilah would have betrayed David. We may observe from this that, however positive a declaration of God may appear that refers to any thing in which man is to be employed, the prediction is not intended to suspend or destroy free agency, but always comprehends in it some particular condition.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 263 of the original edition

Verses 9-11. Bring hither the ephod — Which, doubtless, Abiathar put on; otherwise he could not have inquired of the Lord by it. The Lord said, He will come down — He purposeth to come if thou continue here. For still both David’s question and God’s answer are conditional, upon supposition. As David’s being there was the only motive for Saul’s coming, so, if he departed, Saul could have no inducement to come. And accordingly we find he laid aside his design so soon as he was informed that David had escaped. It seems probable from this place that God’s answer by Urim and Thummim was not by any change in the colour or situation of the precious stones in the breast-plate of the ephod, but by a voice or suggestion from God to the high-priest.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID AT KEILAH, 1-13.

1. Keilah — The modern Kila, situated about four miles northwest of Hebron on a projecting cliff on the right bank of Wady el-Feranj. See on Joshua 15:44. It was a fortified place defended by gates and bars. Verse

7. Threshing floors — See on Judges 6:11, and Ruth 3:2.

12

Then said David, Will the men of Keilah deliver me and my men into the hand of Saul? And the LORD said, They will deliver thee up.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 139 of the original edition

Verses 11. - 12. In these verses we find the following questions and answers:-David said, Will Saul come down to Keilah? And the Lord said, He will come down. Will the men of Keilah deliver me and my men into the hand of Saul? And the Lord said, They will deliver thee up. In this short history we find an ample proof that there is such a thing as contingency in human affairs; that is, God has poised many things between a possibility of being and not being, leaving it to the will of the creature to turn the scale. In the above answers of the Lord the following conditions were evidently implied:-IF thou continue in Keilah, Saul will certainly come down; and IF Saul come down, the men of Keilah will deliver thee into his hands. Now though the text positively asserts that Saul would come to Keilah, yet he did not come; and that the men of Keilah would deliver David into his hand, yet David was not thus delivered to him. And why? Because David left Keilah; but had he stayed, Saul would have come down, and the men of Keilah would have betrayed David. We may observe from this that, however positive a declaration of God may appear that refers to any thing in which man is to be employed, the prediction is not intended to suspend or destroy free agency, but always comprehends in it some particular condition.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 263 of the original edition

Verse 12. The Lord said, They will deliver thee up — God saw the base and cowardly disposition of the inhabitants of Keilah, who, though they had been so lately delivered by David, yet would have given him up, had he stayed among them, at the first appearance of Saul’s army coming against them. “And here, methinks,” says Delaney, “is an event that will easily solve that hard question, about the consistency of the divine prescience with human free-will. A good politician, who was let into the course of Saul’s secret practices with the men of Keilah, and had fair opportunities of sifting their dispositions upon the point, might fairly pronounce upon the event; how much more, then, that all-seeing God, who searcheth the secrets of the heart, and seeth the thoughts afar off — seeth them in all their secret workings, tendencies, and temptations, and through all their mazes and masks.” To explain this a little further: the inhabitants of Keilah acted freely, just as their own hearts dictated to them; they were at liberty to behave faithfully to David, had he stayed among them, as well as to betray him. God did not, therefore, pronounce that they would deliver him up to Saul, because he had laid them under any absolute necessity of so doing; but because he saw Saul’s secret designs, on the one hand, and the secret workings of their minds, and their tendency to fear and baseness, on the other. And, therefore, when David inquired of him, he pronounced, They will deliver thee up. If any person could have known as much of their hearts as God, he might have pronounced the same concerning them. It is, however, the property of God only to see the secrets of the heart. And as this power in him extends to every man that cometh into the world, as folly as it did to the people of Keilah, we may easily conceive how God foreknows all the changes of events in this world from the beginning to the end, though he leave the human mind to act of itself freely; and only by his superintending wisdom directs all, to bring about his gracious purposes, and to educe good from evil.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID AT KEILAH, 1-13.

1. Keilah — The modern Kila, situated about four miles northwest of Hebron on a projecting cliff on the right bank of Wady el-Feranj. See on Joshua 15:44. It was a fortified place defended by gates and bars. Verse

7. Threshing floors — See on Judges 6:11, and Ruth 3:2.

13

Then David and his men, which were about six hundred, arose and departed out of Keilah, and went whithersoever they could go. And it was told Saul that David was escaped from Keilah; and he forbare to go forth.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 264 of the original edition

Verses 13, 14. Which were about six hundred — His forces were increased two hundred since his famous victory over the Philistines at Keilah. Whithersoever they could go — To the first convenient place of safety to which a way lay open. In the wilderness of Ziph — A mountainous wilderness, within the precincts of the tribe of Judah, and upon the confines of Edom, Joshua 15:2. It was not far from Maon and Carmel, verse 25, 1 Samuel 25:5. God delivered him not into his hand — Saul confidently pronounced, when he found David had entered into Keilah, that God had delivered him into his hand. And, therefore, to show the vanity of that ill-grounded confidence, the sacred writer makes use of the very same expression reversed, and declares God delivered him not into his hand, though Saul sought him every day.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID AT KEILAH, 1-13.

1. Keilah — The modern Kila, situated about four miles northwest of Hebron on a projecting cliff on the right bank of Wady el-Feranj. See on Joshua 15:44. It was a fortified place defended by gates and bars. Verse

7. Threshing floors — See on Judges 6:11, and Ruth 3:2.

14

And David abode in the wilderness in strong holds, and remained in a mountain in the wilderness of Ziph. And Saul sought him every day, but God delivered him not into his hand.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 140 of the original edition

Verse 14. Wilderness of Ziph] Ziph was a city in the southern part of Judea, not far from Carmel.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 264 of the original edition

Verses 13, 14. Which were about six hundred — His forces were increased two hundred since his famous victory over the Philistines at Keilah. Whithersoever they could go — To the first convenient place of safety to which a way lay open. In the wilderness of Ziph — A mountainous wilderness, within the precincts of the tribe of Judah, and upon the confines of Edom, Joshua 15:2. It was not far from Maon and Carmel, verse 25, 1 Samuel 25:5. God delivered him not into his hand — Saul confidently pronounced, when he found David had entered into Keilah, that God had delivered him into his hand. And, therefore, to show the vanity of that ill-grounded confidence, the sacred writer makes use of the very same expression reversed, and declares God delivered him not into his hand, though Saul sought him every day.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID IN THE DESERTS OF ZIPH AND MAON, 14-29.

14. A mountain in the wilderness of Ziph — Perhaps the same eminence, about three miles southeast of Hebron, that still bears the name Tell Zif; at all events, some mountain in this vicinity is meant. Compare Joshua 15:55. Saul sought him every day — He probably supposed that David was gathering troops around him for hostile purposes against himself, and that when adequately strong he would not hesitate to make an attempt upon the throne. He may have feared also that David would issue a call to the tribes of Israel for help, for he well knew how popular the young hero was wherever he was known.

15

And David saw that Saul was come out to seek his life: and David was in the wilderness of Ziph in a wood.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID IN THE DESERTS OF ZIPH AND MAON, 14-29.

14. A mountain in the wilderness of Ziph — Perhaps the same eminence, about three miles southeast of Hebron, that still bears the name Tell Zif; at all events, some mountain in this vicinity is meant. Compare Joshua 15:55. Saul sought him every day — He probably supposed that David was gathering troops around him for hostile purposes against himself, and that when adequately strong he would not hesitate to make an attempt upon the throne. He may have feared also that David would issue a call to the tribes of Israel for help, for he well knew how popular the young hero was wherever he was known.

16

And Jonathan Saul’s son arose, and went to David into the wood, and strengthened his hand in God.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 68 of the original edition

V. 16. And strengthened-He comforted and supported him against all his fears, by minding him of God’s infallible promises made to him, and his singular providence which hitherto had and still would be with him.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 140 of the original edition

Verse 16. And Jonathan-strengthened his hand in God.] It is probable that there was always a secret intercourse between David and Jonathan, and that by this most trusty friend he was apprised of the various designs of Saul to take away his life. As Jonathan well knew that God had appointed David to the kingdom, he came now to encourage him to trust in the Most High, and to assure him that the hand of Saul should not prevail against him; and at this interview they renewed their covenant of friendship. Now all this Jonathan could do, consistently with his duty to his father and his king. He knew that David had delivered the kingdom; he saw that his father was ruling unconstitutionally; and he knew that God had appointed David to succeed Saul. This he knew would come about in the order of Providence; and neither he nor David took one step to hasten the time. Jonathan, by his several interferences, prevented his father from imbruing his hands in innocent blood: a more filial and a more loyal part he could not have acted; and therefore, in his attachment to David, he is wholly free of blame.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 264 of the original edition

Verse 16. Jonathan went and strengthened his hand in God — He comforted and supported him against all his fears, by considerations on the divine goodness and power, and by reminding him of God’s faithful promises made to him, and of his singular providence, which hitherto had been, and still would be with him.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 558 of the original edition

16. Jonathan… arose and went to David — Whether Jonathan ever accompanied his father in the pursuit after David we are nowhere told, but it is very evident that he never sought to take his friend. His true heart was incapable of such duplicity. Strengthened his hand in God — Encouraged and cheered him in his faith and hope. He was now satisfied that David was destined to be king; his anointing by Samuel was probably well known, and Jonathan’s greatest desire was to be next to him in the kingdom, and in that position to share his friendship as in the past.

17

And he said unto him, Fear not: for the hand of Saul my father shall not find thee; and thou shalt be king over Israel, and I shall be next unto thee; and that also Saul my father knoweth.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 68 of the original edition

V. 17. Next to thee-Which he gathered either from David’s generosity, and friendship to him; or from some promise made to him by David concerning it. So that the whole imports thus much; I do not look to be king myself (as by my birth I might expect,) but that thou shalt be king (God having so appointed) and I but in a secondary place inferior to thee.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 264 of the original edition

Verse 17. Thou shalt be king, and I shall be next unto thee — Or, hold the second place in the kingdom; which words import thus much: I do not look to be king myself, as by my birth I might expect, but that thou shalt be king, God having so appointed, and I but in a secondary place, inferior to thee. The first part of this sentence Jonathan might well speak, as he had the promise of God for it, which must stand; but the other he spoke in human confidence, and the event showed how little is to be built on that. He ought, as we ought all to do with respect to what is future and only in expectation, to have spoken in the language of St. James: “If the Lord will, I shall be next unto thee.” And that also my father knoweth — For he could not but remember what Samuel told him, (1 Samuel 15:28,) and, from David’s wonderful successes, he probably inferred that he was the person of whom Samuel spake.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID IN THE DESERTS OF ZIPH AND MAON, 14-29.

14. A mountain in the wilderness of Ziph — Perhaps the same eminence, about three miles southeast of Hebron, that still bears the name Tell Zif; at all events, some mountain in this vicinity is meant. Compare Joshua 15:55. Saul sought him every day — He probably supposed that David was gathering troops around him for hostile purposes against himself, and that when adequately strong he would not hesitate to make an attempt upon the throne. He may have feared also that David would issue a call to the tribes of Israel for help, for he well knew how popular the young hero was wherever he was known.

18

And they two made a covenant before the LORD: and David abode in the wood, and Jonathan went to his house.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 68 of the original edition

V. 18. Made a covenant-They then parted, and never came together again, that we find, in this world.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 265 of the original edition

Verse 18. They two made a covenant before the Lord — We have reason here to admire the sincere friendship of Jonathan, which remained so unshaken to David in all events, as well in his adversity and dangers, as in his prosperity and successes. It is to be observed, that, after making this covenant, they never came together again, that we find, in this world.

Joseph Sutcliffe
Joseph Sutcliffe's Commentary · p. 749 of the original edition

Ver. 18. They two made a covenant. This was the third, or the renewal of the covenants. The first was after the victory over Goliath and the Philistines. The second when they met at the rock Ezel. The third here, in the wilderness of Ziph, when it was renewed with some enlargements.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 558 of the original edition

18. They two made a covenant before the Lord — Alone in the wilderness of Ziph, and probably at the still hour of night, with none but Jehovah to witness, they solemnly renewed the covenant in which they had bound themselves twice before. 1 Samuel 18:30; 20:16. This was the last time that Jonathan and the son of Jesse met.

19

Then came up the Ziphites to Saul to Gibeah, saying, Doth not David hide himself with us in strong holds in the wood, in the hill of Hachilah, which is on the south of Jeshimon?

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 69 of the original edition

V. 19. Ziphites-Who were of David’s own tribe tho’ for this their unnatural carriage to him, he calls them strangers, Psalm 54:3.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 265 of the original edition

Verses 19-22. Then came the Ziphites to Saul — They were of David’s own tribe, though for this unnatural carriage to him he calls them strangers. Saul said, Blessed be ye of the Lord — Saul, notwithstanding all his injustice and cruelty to David, still supposes himself to be the injured person, and his cause the right one. Thus too often do men let their passions blind them so as to persuade themselves that the most unjust things are equitable. Go, I pray you, prepare yet — Or rather, Make yourselves more certain of this, as the words may be translated, and more agreeably to what follows.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 558 of the original edition

19. Came up the Ziphites to Saul to Gibeah — From which it appears that Saul had now for a season given up his search for David. The treachery of the Ziphites is mentioned in marked contrast with the constancy of Jonathan. Encouraged by his interview with Jonathan, and strong in hope and faith, David composes on this occasion Psalm 54. The hill of Hachilah — Perhaps the same eminence mentioned in verse 14, for no hill of this name has been discovered in the neighbourhood of Ziph. The word Hachilah means dark, and may be regarded as an adjective descriptive of the hill in question, which was then covered with dark forest shades. On the south of Jeshimon — Rather, as in the margin, on the right hand of the wilderness; that is, as we see at 1 Samuel 26:1, before, or in front of the wilderness. Uncertainty as to the particular hill in question leads to like uncertainty as to the desert mentioned here and verse

20

Now therefore, O king, come down according to all the desire of thy soul to come down; and our part shall be to deliver him into the king’s hand.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 265 of the original edition

Verses 19-22. Then came the Ziphites to Saul — They were of David’s own tribe, though for this unnatural carriage to him he calls them strangers. Saul said, Blessed be ye of the Lord — Saul, notwithstanding all his injustice and cruelty to David, still supposes himself to be the injured person, and his cause the right one. Thus too often do men let their passions blind them so as to persuade themselves that the most unjust things are equitable. Go, I pray you, prepare yet — Or rather, Make yourselves more certain of this, as the words may be translated, and more agreeably to what follows.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID IN THE DESERTS OF ZIPH AND MAON, 14-29.

14. A mountain in the wilderness of Ziph — Perhaps the same eminence, about three miles southeast of Hebron, that still bears the name Tell Zif; at all events, some mountain in this vicinity is meant. Compare Joshua 15:55. Saul sought him every day — He probably supposed that David was gathering troops around him for hostile purposes against himself, and that when adequately strong he would not hesitate to make an attempt upon the throne. He may have feared also that David would issue a call to the tribes of Israel for help, for he well knew how popular the young hero was wherever he was known.

21

And Saul said, Blessed be ye of the LORD; for ye have compassion on me.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 265 of the original edition

Verses 19-22. Then came the Ziphites to Saul — They were of David’s own tribe, though for this unnatural carriage to him he calls them strangers. Saul said, Blessed be ye of the Lord — Saul, notwithstanding all his injustice and cruelty to David, still supposes himself to be the injured person, and his cause the right one. Thus too often do men let their passions blind them so as to persuade themselves that the most unjust things are equitable. Go, I pray you, prepare yet — Or rather, Make yourselves more certain of this, as the words may be translated, and more agreeably to what follows.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID IN THE DESERTS OF ZIPH AND MAON, 14-29.

14. A mountain in the wilderness of Ziph — Perhaps the same eminence, about three miles southeast of Hebron, that still bears the name Tell Zif; at all events, some mountain in this vicinity is meant. Compare Joshua 15:55. Saul sought him every day — He probably supposed that David was gathering troops around him for hostile purposes against himself, and that when adequately strong he would not hesitate to make an attempt upon the throne. He may have feared also that David would issue a call to the tribes of Israel for help, for he well knew how popular the young hero was wherever he was known.

22

Go, I pray you, prepare yet, and know and see his place where his haunt is, and who hath seen him there: for it is told me that he dealeth very subtilly.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 265 of the original edition

Verses 19-22. Then came the Ziphites to Saul — They were of David’s own tribe, though for this unnatural carriage to him he calls them strangers. Saul said, Blessed be ye of the Lord — Saul, notwithstanding all his injustice and cruelty to David, still supposes himself to be the injured person, and his cause the right one. Thus too often do men let their passions blind them so as to persuade themselves that the most unjust things are equitable. Go, I pray you, prepare yet — Or rather, Make yourselves more certain of this, as the words may be translated, and more agreeably to what follows.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID IN THE DESERTS OF ZIPH AND MAON, 14-29.

14. A mountain in the wilderness of Ziph — Perhaps the same eminence, about three miles southeast of Hebron, that still bears the name Tell Zif; at all events, some mountain in this vicinity is meant. Compare Joshua 15:55. Saul sought him every day — He probably supposed that David was gathering troops around him for hostile purposes against himself, and that when adequately strong he would not hesitate to make an attempt upon the throne. He may have feared also that David would issue a call to the tribes of Israel for help, for he well knew how popular the young hero was wherever he was known.

23

See therefore, and take knowledge of all the lurking places where he hideth himself, and come ye again to me with the certainty, and I will go with you: and it shall come to pass, if he be in the land, that I will search him out throughout all the thousands of Judah.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 557 of the original edition

DAVID IN THE DESERTS OF ZIPH AND MAON, 14-29.

14. A mountain in the wilderness of Ziph — Perhaps the same eminence, about three miles southeast of Hebron, that still bears the name Tell Zif; at all events, some mountain in this vicinity is meant. Compare Joshua 15:55. Saul sought him every day — He probably supposed that David was gathering troops around him for hostile purposes against himself, and that when adequately strong he would not hesitate to make an attempt upon the throne. He may have feared also that David would issue a call to the tribes of Israel for help, for he well knew how popular the young hero was wherever he was known.

24

And they arose, and went to Ziph before Saul: but David and his men were in the wilderness of Maon, in the plain on the south of Jeshimon.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 265 of the original edition

Verses 24, 25. But David and his men were in the wilderness of Maon — Having heard what the Ziphites had undertaken, David disappointed their design by going into another place, with which, it is likely, they were not so well acquainted. For Maon was a distant wilderness from Ziph, though both were in the tribe of Judah. Saul also and his men went to seek him — Hearing, it is likely, by the Ziphites, whither he was gone. Therefore he came down into a rock — Some craggy, desolate place, where he thought Saul would not find him; or rather, into a cave which was in the rock, where, at first, he might think to hide himself; but, on further consideration, he removed from thence upon Saul’s approach.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 558 of the original edition

24, but the reference is most probably to the desert wastes lying between the wilderness of Ziph and the Dead Sea. A person at Gibeah would naturally speak of the wildernesses of Ziph and of Maon as lying to the right of the desert, on the west of the Dead Sea.

24. Wilderness of Maon — This lay about four miles southeast of Ziph, and is still marked by the modern Main. Compare Joshua 15:55. Thus as David found himself pursued and hunted even by the Ziphites, he retreated still further to the south. On the south of Jeshimon — Rather, on the right of the desert. See note on verse 19.

25

Saul also and his men went to seek him. And they told David; wherefore he came down into a rock, and abode in the wilderness of Maon. And when Saul heard that, he pursued after David in the wilderness of Maon.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 69 of the original edition

V. 25. A rock-That is, into a cave which was in the rock; where at first he might think to hide himself, but upon farther consideration he removed from thence upon Saul’s approach.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 140 of the original edition

Verse 25. The wilderness of Maon.] Maon was a mountainous district in the most southern parts of Judah. Calmet supposes it to be the city of Menois, which Eusebius places in the vicinity of Gaza; and the Mænæmi Castrum, which the Theodosian code places near to Beersheba.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 265 of the original edition

Verses 24, 25. But David and his men were in the wilderness of Maon — Having heard what the Ziphites had undertaken, David disappointed their design by going into another place, with which, it is likely, they were not so well acquainted. For Maon was a distant wilderness from Ziph, though both were in the tribe of Judah. Saul also and his men went to seek him — Hearing, it is likely, by the Ziphites, whither he was gone. Therefore he came down into a rock — Some craggy, desolate place, where he thought Saul would not find him; or rather, into a cave which was in the rock, where, at first, he might think to hide himself; but, on further consideration, he removed from thence upon Saul’s approach.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 558 of the original edition

25. He came down into a rock — Literally, he went down the rock. The margin gives the meaning, he went down from the rock. The rock was probably the summit of the hill Main, which is two hundred feet high, and from which there is a wide prospect over the country around.

26

And Saul went on this side of the mountain, and David and his men on that side of the mountain: and David made haste to get away for fear of Saul; for Saul and his men compassed David and his men round about to take them.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 140 of the original edition

Verse 26. Saul went on this side of the mountain] Evidently not knowing that David and his men were on the other side.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 559 of the original edition

26. Saul went on this side of the mountain, and David… on that side — From his rocky height David watched the approach of his enemy, and by his knowledge of the wilderness and his strategic skill he baffled all the efforts made to entrap him. But the verse implies that David’s plight at this time was a most hazardous one, and his pursuers had well nigh taken him.

27

But there came a messenger unto Saul, saying, Haste thee, and come; for the Philistines have invaded the land.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 69 of the original edition

V. 27. A messenger, &c.-The wisdom of God is never at a loss for ways, and means to preserve his people.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 140 of the original edition

Verse 27. There came a messenger] See the providence of God exerted for the salvation of David’s life! David and his men are almost surrounded by Saul and his army, and on the point of being taken, when a messenger arrives and informs Saul that the Philistines had invaded the land! But behold the workings of Providence! God had already prepared the invasion of the land by the Philistines, and kept Saul ignorant how much David was in his power; but as his advanced guards and scouts must have discovered him in a very short time, the messenger arrives just at the point of time to prevent it. Here David was delivered by God, and in such a manner too as rendered the Divine interposition visible.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 265 of the original edition

Verses 27, 28. There came a messenger unto Saul — See the providence of God! His wisdom is never at a loss for ways and means to preserve his people. Nothing could be more distressful, nothing more hopeless than the situation of David at this time. He was surrounded on all sides, and there seemed no way left for escape; but as we learn from the fifty-fourth Psalm, composed by him on this occasion, he addressed himself in prayer to his almighty Saviour, who soon showed him that he can deliver at all times, and in all circumstances, however dangerous and distressing. They called that place [twqlhmh [ls] Sela-hammah-lekoth — That is, the rock of divisions. Because God, by this interposition of the Philistines invading the land just at this time, separated Saul from David, and in a manner pulled him away, when the latter was now almost within his reach.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 559 of the original edition

27. There came a messenger — This was a signal working of Providence to deliver the son of Jesse from most imminent peril.

28

Wherefore Saul returned from pursuing after David, and went against the Philistines: therefore they called that place Selahammahlekoth.

John Wesley
John Wesley's Explanatory Notes · p. 69 of the original edition

V. 28. Called, &c.-That is, The rock of divisions, because there Saul was separated, and in a manner pulled asunder from David, who was now almost within his reach.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 141 of the original edition

Verse 28. They called that place Sela-hammah-lekoth.] That is, the rock of divisions; because, says the Targum, the heart of the king was divided to go hither and thither. Here Saul was obliged to separate himself from David, in order to go and oppose the invading Philistines.

Joseph Benson
Joseph Benson's Commentary · p. 265 of the original edition

Verses 27, 28. There came a messenger unto Saul — See the providence of God! His wisdom is never at a loss for ways and means to preserve his people. Nothing could be more distressful, nothing more hopeless than the situation of David at this time. He was surrounded on all sides, and there seemed no way left for escape; but as we learn from the fifty-fourth Psalm, composed by him on this occasion, he addressed himself in prayer to his almighty Saviour, who soon showed him that he can deliver at all times, and in all circumstances, however dangerous and distressing. They called that place [twqlhmh [ls] Sela-hammah-lekoth — That is, the rock of divisions. Because God, by this interposition of the Philistines invading the land just at this time, separated Saul from David, and in a manner pulled him away, when the latter was now almost within his reach.

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 559 of the original edition

28. Sela-hammah-lekoth — According to the ancient versions, the rock of divisions, so called because there Saul and David were divided or separated. According to Gesenius and other recent critics, the rock of escapes, from qlj, to be smooth; then, to slip away and escape referring to David’s escape from Saul.

29

And David went up from thence, and dwelt in strong holds at Engedi.

Adam Clarke
Clarke's Commentary · p. 141 of the original edition

Verse 29. Strong holds at En-gedi.] En-gedi was situated near to the western coast of the Dead Sea, not far from Jeshimon: it literally signifies the kid’s well, and was celebrated for its vineyards, Song of Solomon 1:14. It was also celebrated for its balm. It is reported to be a mountainous territory, filled with caverns; and consequently proper for David in his present circumstances.

How threshing-floors were made among the ancients, we learn from CATO, Deuteronomy Revelation Rustica, chap. 91, and 129. And as I believe it would be an excellent method to make the most durable and efficient barn-floors, I will set it down:—

Aream sic facito. Locum ubi facies confodito; postea amurca conspergito bene, sinitoque combibat. Postea comminuito glebas bene. Deinde coæquato, et paviculis verberato. Postea denuo amurca conspergito, sinitoque arescat. Si ita feceris neque formicæ nocebunt, neque herbæ nascentur: et cum pluerit, lutum non erit. “Make a threshing-floor thus: dig the place thoroughly; afterwards sprinkle it well with the lees of oil, and give it time to soak in. Then beat the clods very fine, make it level, and beat it well down with a paver’s rammer. When this is done, sprinkle it afresh with the oil lees, and let it dry. This being done, the mice cannot burrow in it, no grass can grow through it, nor will the rain dissolve the surface to raise mud.”

The directions of COLUMELLA are nearly the same; but as there as some differences of importance, I will subjoin his account:—

Area quoque si terrena erit, ut sit ad trituram satis habilis, primum radatur, deinde confodiatur, permixtis paleis cum amurca, quæ salem non accepit, extergatur; nam ea res a populatione murium formicarumque frumenta defendit. Tum æquate paviculis, vel molari lapide condensetur, et rursus subjectis paleis inculcetur, atque ita solibus siccanda relinquatur. Deuteronomy Revelation Rustica, lib. ii., c. 20. “If you would have a threshing-floor made on the open ground, that it may be proper for the purpose, first pare off the surface, then let it be well digged, and mixed with lees of oil, unsalted, with which chaff has been mingled, for this prevents the mice and ants from burrowing and injuring the corn. Then level it with a paver’s rammer, or press it down with a millstone. Afterwards scatter chaff over it, tread it down, and leave it to be dried by the sun.”

This may be profitably used within doors, as well as in the field; and a durable and solid floor is a matter of very great consequence to the husbandman, as it prevents the flour from being injured by sand or dust. I SAMUEL

Daniel Whedon
Whedon's Commentary on the Old and New Testament · p. 559 of the original edition

29. En-gedi — See on Joshua 15:62. and verse 1 of the next chapter.